Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who should Gore have selected in 2000 for Vice President?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:50 AM
Original message
Poll question: Who should Gore have selected in 2000 for Vice President?
Hindsight is 20/20, I know, but since I was wondering who everyone thought Gore should've selected in 2000. I personally think he should've picked someone else, but there are many on this board who I've heard defend his choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Richardson or Graham n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CSI Willows Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards
No question about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. bill bradley, would have salved a lot of wounds
lieberman was a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryster Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. I totally disagree
Lieberman was definitely the right choice. Remember, WE WON!! Or did you forget that a lot of the justified anger on DU is about the election being stolen? Tin Russert said of the choice: It's bold. It's historic". He was right. Being Jewish myself I can assure you that Lieberman's place on the ticket was a HUGE help in Florida. Many of the people there are displaced Jews from other places and they voted for Gore AND Lieberman. Lieberman's speech at the convention was well received. Also, remember that after the VP debate a lot of people felt that the Lieberman and Cheney (sorry, but it's true) performed better than Gore or Bush. And certainly Lieberman didn't hurt us the way Gore did with that STUPID STUPID STUPID sighing he did in the first debate. Lieberman in his debate articulated the Dem positions very well. His presence on the ticket did not hurt. It helped.

As for Bradley, have you forgotten what an absolutely horrible campaigner he was? He was pathetic. I don't have the picture to show you but there was a very telling one of him on the Staten Island Ferry on his way to a debate. He was holding on to a strap and TALKING TO NOONE!! How the hell do you run for President, get on the Staten Island Ferry and go mute?!?! I talked to someone who had worked on the Bradley campaign and I brought up that photo. He told me that EVERYONE he knew on the campaign couldn't believe it. They knew at that point that he was dead meat. This is the guy you think should have been there? No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Harkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftist_rebel1569 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wellstone
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. You beat me to that
Wellstone was my first thought, too. I'd have been a lot happier voting for a Gore/Wellstone ticket than Gore/Bassethoundman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. definitely NOT Lieberman (n/t)
no text
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryster Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Response
Please see my response to post #3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hindsight would point to Graham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm with Kodi...would love to have seen Bradley as VP
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryster Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Response
Please see my response to Post #3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wellstone, Feingold or Graham I think
Edited on Sun Nov-16-03 01:39 AM by lcordero
I think that each of them could have gotten him 40 to 50,000 more votes in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bill Clinton
Man, that would have been totally cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Awesomely cool but would that have been legal?
He can't run for President again because of a Constitutional amendment that I'm too lazy to look up right now. Wouldn't that also have prevented him from running for vice-president as well because he would be first in the order of succession? This issue may seem moot now but who knows what might happen. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I don't know. I was wondering about that as well.
I wondered if it means that Clinton could never run as VP, or that maybe if he were VP, and the president somehow couldn't remain in office, if maybe then Clinton would have to be skipped, remain VP, and the speaker of the house become the president.

I can't see any reason from barring a former president from being a VP, but there might be a constitutional provision against it.

Anyone have the answer to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. if he wanted a moral jew
a less sanctimonious fighter for clean government., go with Russ Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. I picked Graham
And he was a favorite before Gore picked Lieberman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cloud Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. Anybody but Lieberman
I remember in the 2000 elections I wasn't really into politics. I was only 17 so I missed voting by one year.

I liked Gore only because I liked Bill Clinton. I thought Bush was alright but came across as arrogant and didn't speak very well. Of course back then I had a lot more respect for Bush than I do now since there was no Iraq war and corporate scandals.

I thought Lieberman was going to take away my violent video games if elected. My Quake, Metal Gear Solid, and such.

Gore could have done much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Anyone whose name didn't resemble a political party
Little known fact that helped doom Al Gore:thousands of Gore voters in Palm Beach County apparently mistook the word Libertarian for Lieberman, and double voted on the infamous butterfly ballot.

The ballot indicated "vote for group" and many unsophisticated voters thought that meant a punch for vice president as well as president. Election officials were baffled over the number of double punches for Gore and Libertarian candidate Harry Browne. The names were far apart on the ballot, unlike the well chronicled case of the butterfly votes for Pat Buchanon that were obviously meant for Gore. An elections expert from Cal Irvine surveyed the gaffes and immediately concluded the voters had mistook Libertarian for Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bossy Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bradley, Graham or Edwards, in that order n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freespirit2003 Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-03 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. gore 2000
Who cares, he lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No, he won. The Supreme Court SELECTED Bush
Edited on Mon Nov-17-03 04:49 PM by RationalRose
Have you no grasp of history, disruptor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. That feller didn't last long, did he?
12 posts isn't a record, but it's close. How many of us sent alerts on his posts? I'll cop to one of 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-03 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Sylvester Stallone. John Wayne.
Any celebrity. Living or dead.

If people are stupid enough to vote for Ahnold and Ventura, why not have John Wayne on the ticket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC