Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rant: the Target employment test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
WilmywoodNCparalegal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:31 PM
Original message
Rant: the Target employment test
Note: this happened about 3 months ago. Then, I was thinking of adding a part-time gig at the local Target store (I decided against it later, since I'm already busy as is and it is not financially necessary). So I went in and I sat at the computer and began their very long screening test with the usual questions about what you'd do if a fellow employee stole, etc.

Some of the questions I was familiar with and I responded the way that retailers want you to respond (though I believe in real life some of the answers would not be as clear cut as they were on the test). And then the kicker, "Do you believe in and follow traditional family values?" (paraphrasing, but that was the gist). WTF of a question is that??? Who determines what's traditional and what isn't?

I answered 'No' to that question and, lo and behold, I got a "thanks but no thanks" card from Target. Now, the irony is that I have no problems whatsoever in finding employment in my field, which requires substantial knowledge of a very narrow field of law (along with writing skills and familiarity with many fields ranging from engineering to fashion) - so much so that many times prospective employers have contacted me rather than vice versa. But I guess I am not Target material and not qualified to be a Target 'Associate'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, let me get this straight...
For every other question, you "responded the way that retailers want you to respond."

But, when it came to this one, you couldn't?

Hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That is a little weird. If you are going to lie for
some of the questions, why not this one! Is this the one that he/she HAD to take a stand on? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Delayed cognitive dissonance.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe you got dinged because your answers were inconsistent?
When you answer according to what you think they want to see, your answers tend to be less consistent than they would be if you were answering honestly. (They build in questions to test for that.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilmywoodNCparalegal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. This was the question that I despised the most
and the one I least expected. By the time this question came up (towards the end), the wording of it and the underlying assumption made me quite angry, which is why this question was not answered "the way Target would have wanted."


I did not answer all of the questions the way you're supposed to answer either. I am just illustrating that this question was, in my opinion, uncalled for and totally not relevant (unlike the other questions) to the position of Associate at one of their stores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dont' we all believe in 'traditional' values?
We just believe values aren't limited to the Stepford family. We add more on top of the traditional family and include all kinds of decent folks.

Stupid question and to be honest.. I'm wondering if it's legal to discriminate if they intent that to be some kind of political/lifestyle type thing.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And what exactly is traditional anyway?
Traditional for me is probably completely different from what is traditional for you. Plus, I am sure it differs depending on where you live. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. that was my point.. traditional in the sense of loving relationships
is something we all need in life and can all agree on. However, we are secure enough with ourselves to not be afraid of anything other than a heterosexual couple with 1.75 kids that drive an SUV.

Where you live means nothing. There are bigots everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. There are bigots everywhere. But
"traditional" here in Mississippi is going to be very different than "traditional" in Los Angeles or New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm arguing the semantics of what traditional means here.
Edited on Mon Dec-12-05 03:52 PM by nini
I don't think anyone does not believe a traditional family is a good thing - does this mean anything other than that isn't? - NO.

What constitutes the family is what we disagree with the other side on.

I am arguing more on the semantics of this - I could have answered that question the way they wanted and not felt I was lying. My beliefs include thinking their version of the family is ok. They didn't ask if I felt a man/woman and two kids were the ONLY acceptable situation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. I had to endure an assinine anti-union presentation for a new job...
just the other day. Chock full of bullshit lies. And the new hires were all toadying right along. Bunch of boobleheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tradition is in the eye of the traditionalist :P . . .
I mean, if your name is Neil Horsley, your traditions involve female donkeys :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. The definition of 'traditional values' aside
I'm wondering what the hell that question has to do with anything related to one's qualifications to be a Target "associate," or any other job outside, say, the priesthood.



Oh, wait... bad example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Last time I was in Target...
...the guy who checked me out had a green mohawk, black lipstick and nail polish, and his nametag said his name was "Star."

I wonder what his answer to that question was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It would be "yes". His family traditions would be slightly different
than yours, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC