Who has seen 28 Days?

[RebelOne]

To me it was very disappointing. Typical end-of-the-world-as-we-know- it film.

[DS1]

1. wouldn't simply cutting off a toe end the world as you know it?

/phrase gripe

As far as the movie goes, it had its moments, but it's still just another zombie movie in the end.

[RebelOne]

2. Right, sort of like Night of the Living Dead remake in England.

[joeybee12]

3. Yeah, I was disappointed too--lots of style, no substance

[slor]

4. I enjoyed it...

it was not as gratuitous as most american horror/sci-fi flicks though it had some gore. The sub-plot such as the racial/sexual tension between the heroine and hero also added depth to the movie. Overall I found it quite good.

[RebelOne]

5. Did you watch it on DVD and see the alternative ending?

Very interesting. A rooster took the place of the hero.

[jpgray]

6. Dawn of the Dead is much better

:D

[YellowRubberDuckie]

7. Oh...you mean 28 Days Later....

I was wondering what the hell you were talking about.
Duckie

[RebelOne]

12. Sorry, I meant 28 Days Later

[BlueJazz]

8. I found it quite enjoyable.

I didn't get the feeling that the director was trying to manipulate the
audience as much as other films I've seen (in that genre)

[pasadenaboy]

9. I liked the shots in deserted London

that was really creepy. I loved the acting, and thought the movie was super entertaining.

[rumguy]

10. I thought it was great and a parable for our times

The zombies were infecteed with rage...

Some of them reminded me of freepers...

[SheilaT]

11. It was okay.

I flew up to Detroit back in August, the morning after the big blackout occurred, when almost no power was back on. I have never before flown over a large city that was so utterly deserted. It reminded me of 28 Days Later.

[FireHeart]

13. I saw it a few weeks ago.

Thought it was rather boring. Pretty predictable and while the cinematography was well done in many places, the acting wasn't.

Whaddya gonna do?

=)