Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK...now the "Lost" story is clear to me (spoilers)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:06 PM
Original message
OK...now the "Lost" story is clear to me (spoilers)
OK...I'm convinced of two things. One: the smoke monster also appeared as Dave to Hurley, Yemi to Eko, Christian Shepard to Jack and the Horse to Kate (and Sawyer.) Methinks its testing them to see if they are "good" or "bad."

Likewise, Juliet's flashcard thingy is also a test to see if Jack is "good" or "bad." The one determiner seems to be whether one is a murderer or not. Sun became "Bad" when she killed Colleen. If Jack goes through and kills Ben, he will be deemed as "bad" and killed. If he does not, my guess is one of two things: (1) Ben, knowing he's dying, will choose Jack as his sucessor or (2) The Others do not, in fact, exist, but are apparitions of the smoke monster.

One theory I've toyed with is that perhaps none of it is real - the smoke monster, the others - all of it a hallucination brought on by the disease that Rousseau talked about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Frankly, at this point the only thing that makes sense is aliens.
Four toed statue? Weird eletromagnetic thingy (possible crashed motor)? Space Folding? Nano-Monster?

Screams aliens to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deucemagnet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. One thing I can't quite understand.
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 02:12 PM by deucemagnet
If the island cured Locke of his paralysis and Rose of her cancer, why wouldn't it cure Ben? Maybe he has to be on the main island to be cured, explaining why he was captured in the jungle by Rousseau and the Losties?

On edit: It also cured Jin's infertility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Um, I thought that little one was a result of the affair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The show wasn't really clear on that.
Maybe it's Jins, maybe it's not.

I think the main island does not actually cure people. It just makes the problems go away and stops the progression of the disease, while people on that island. So, when Ben goes back to Otherland, the tumor starts growing again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Remember when Rose visited the faith healer in Australia?
And he told her something to the effect that different people are attuned to different locations and types of energy to make the healing work?

Ben probably just isn't "in tune" with the healing energies of the Island.

(Maybe this has something to do with the fact that he was born there???)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do the characters exhibit the theories of their namesakes?
Locke, Hume, Rousseau?

This show is way overrated (now) because it started to believe it's own hype at how awesome it was, a similar thing happened to the Sopranos after their first season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They do, actually
Especially Locke last night - he gave who came with him the choice to do so, the choice to choose one's fate.

It's been mentioned that Jack represents Socialism (no choice, but benign and working for the equalization of all), Sawyer Capitalism (every man for himself), Rousseau like her namesake (move away from everything and start your own commune), and Locke, Political Liberalism (all about freewill.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. About the last theory you mention...
How would that explain Desmond's girlfriend and the two dudes in the Antarctic or wherever they were?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Good question
That's a very good question! ;)

Perhaps the hatch existed, but the Others don't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Could be, could be.
I'm pissed that next week's episode is the last until February. Argh! Fuck the naysayers, I'm hooked and still love that damn show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Same here
They even killed off one of my favorite characters last night, and I still thought it was the best episode so far this season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Jack already mercy-killed the US Marshall
So it can't really be about that.

I think Juliet is on the level and really does want Jack to kill Ben. No one has anything to gain by "conning" Jack into killing Ben.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But that's not murder
It's killing, but mercy killing, not murder.

Killing Ben would be Murder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Well, we could argue about that one all day
Regardless, Jack took his life.

One could even argue that killing Ben on the table would be a form of mercy killing; I'm guessing that a giant agressive tumor on the spine is going to be pretty painful.

It just doesn't make sense that you'd let someone kill your leader just to get a sense of whether they're "good" or "bad".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. So basically season #2 is shot to shit
I mean, they got rid of the two girls and now they offed Eco, so why did they even have tailies? I mean, I figured they were going to kill those two red-shirt trekkies that beammed down with Kirk, Spock & McCoy.

Anyhow, Lost has so jumped the shark that the shark is back by the mainland Australia. Eventually I flipped over to watch the top #100 songs of the 80s on VH1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's because DUI's automatically make you a "bad" person
And you die :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is a JJ Abrams show.
Or at least it was originally. Take it from a stll-disgruntled veteran of "Alias" fandom --For the sake of your sanity, do not -- I repeat, do not -- expect "Lost" to make any sense. It never will. I have been boycotting Abrams and ABC ever since the abysmal "Alias" series finale, and I haven't been missing a thing. It's nice to have my sanity back, such as it is, though. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think To Kill a Mockingbird is more important
than a passing allusion.

The title comes from a line in the novel that it is a sin to kill a mockingbird because they only sing and make people happy but you can kill all the bluejays you want because they are mean little bastards.

I think this is about people appearing to be good actually being bad. Something developed in The Bad Twin (the seemingly good brother was a prick and the slug-like brother was actually a good guy). Colleen wants to kill Ben (he is the metaphoric mockingbird in this instance) because she wants power. Ben seems like the bad guy but is actually good and Colleen seems like a good person but is really the bad guy. Remember the Sawyer/Kate in the field fight? "She would have killed me." Colleen's a bad one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. of course, it could all still be happening inside hurley's head
i don't think that explanation was entirely shot down by that episode (which was one of my favorites, but, then, I'm a hurley fan).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC