lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:36 AM
Original message |
The Cliff Notes version - court case and supreme court ruling |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 12:09 PM by lizziegrace
------- EVENT LISTING --------
11/15/2006 Majority Opinion Rendered ACTION = Affirmed Opinion Date - 11/15/06 Consist of 0 pages, Cite Number - Publish - yes Justice-- WRITING Justices, JJ., agree. 11/15/2006 Opinion Panel Justice -- WRITING
My sister is the appellant.
I don't recall that the original court case involved the issue of jurisdiction and my sister's attorney appealed on the basis that this county in a southern state has no jurisdiction in the case, as my sister has lived overseas for more than 1/2 the childrens' lives and it is a hardship to expect her and all witnesses to come to the states to testify.
The judge ruled in her favor (original hearing) on the issue of custody.
This is where the confusion lies. If the appeal is based on jurisdiction and the original decision didn't address jurisdiction, what does this mean?
|
taterguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 11:53 AM by taterguy
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. edited to remove details n/t |
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 11:52 AM by Deep13
"affirmed" means the court of appeals agrees with the trial court. Since she is the appellant, she was challenging the trial court's order.
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Hague treaties and international law mean nothing then |
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Not nothing...depends on the situation. Too bad you deleted the post:( nt |
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
BikeWriter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. No, not in domestic courts. |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 12:23 PM by Deep13
Mostly those are agreements and law among nations, not individuals. (By "domestic" I mean American civilian courts, not necessarily divorce courts.)
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Her London attorney is telling her |
|
that the US courts have no jurisdiction. London tells her to ignore the rulings here in the states and the judge in the southern state she lived keeps ruling.
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Don't know what to say about that. |
|
Possession is 9/10 of the law, as they say. I suspect that where ever the kiddoes are, that jurisdiction will have the final practical say.
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. It's the felony bench warrant |
|
that's out now because she couldn't appear. It's the fact that *if* the county had money, this judge (and he's the only circuit judge in the county) would have her extradited.
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't know what the original ruling was |
|
her attorney was asking the supreme court to rule on jurisdiction.
Sorry, but I felt it was best to delete the original post.
|
asthmaticeog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
BikeWriter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Yes! This had to be exposed! |
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
10. why do you hate america? |
BikeWriter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. This is HUGH! I'm series!!!!!!111 |
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. two words: the french |
BikeWriter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
25. You got that right in spades! |
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message |
15. The upper court agrees with the lower court's view of it. |
|
If the lower court thought jurisdiction was a non-issue, then the appellate court agrees with that.
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. I won't ever see her again |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 12:34 PM by lizziegrace
unless I go overseas. I can't begin to tell you how bad this is and how much it's hurt my family and those kids. It's been $70,000 in attorney fees so far.
There's a felony warrant out because she was not served (and as a result didn't appear) and even if she was, she doesn't have the means to come here. The judge refused to allow written or taped depositions.
Damn. Oh god...
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Holy shit! Whoever lost, the lawyers won. |
|
Sorry for your situation.
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
all this because her ex was lying about when the kids were in the states and short-paying the child support. He threw in that they were abused because someone told him it would help his case. It's exploded exponentially and now my sister's got a felony warrant out and cannot come back into the states. He never wanted these kids. He signed away custody 3 times. The judge ruled against him on the custody and abuse charges in the original case.
Damn.
|
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
22. I am horrified, my dear lizziegrace...... |
|
This is a continuing nightmare...........
Wish I could do something, anything...
:hug:
|
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
miss_american_pie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
26. I'm sorry lizziegrace |
lizziegrace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
This whole thing has nearly cost my parents their sanity. And I really miss my sister and the kids. :(
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message |