bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 06:00 PM
Original message |
| if the manger had to be OSHA prior-approved for habitation... |
|
would the baby jeebus still have to wear a hard-hat to comply :dunce:
|
| idgiehkt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-26-06 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
|
you said 'hard-hat' heh-heh-heh-heh  |
| bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-26-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| SPKrazy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-26-06 01:03 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. He Might Have Had To Have Been Placed In |
|
something other than swaddling clothes
and the health dept. would have had something to say about the hygiene of the manger in the shed too
and well, the innkeeper would have been cited for renting out an unsafe room to Mary and Joseph
but only if their managed care company complained probably, if it covered mangers in sheds, then that would have been okay I guess.
:hi:
You b funny bridgit!
|
| bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-26-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. hahahaha, can you imagine... |
| buddhamama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-26-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-26-06 12:12 PM by buddhamama
would have found themselves facing a substantial fine and possible lawsuit. :)
|
| bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-26-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. there'ya go, Mary bouncing the baby jeebus on her hip as Joseph... |
|
and her are standing beyond the docket trying to get their citation vacated O8)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
