Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Casino Royale

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:29 PM
Original message
Poll question: Casino Royale
What say you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. We saw it last night.
The theater was sold out. We both very much enjoyed it. It really is a re-invention of the genre. The opening scene was amazing. I loved all the Parkour stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not the firs to emulate the style of the Bond books...
Casino Royale is the first Bond film since "Licence to Kill" that takes proceedings seriously. It is also more or less authentic to the book (all things considered). We haven't anything so close to the original novel since "On Her Majesty's Secret Service".

It is a reboot as the production team dates the movie in such a way that none of the previous Bond movies exist, and


(SPOILER) is the start of a multi-movie story arc.

(SPOILER ENDS)



Given the Bond books were originally rough and gruff with a Bond that was dangerous, not PC, a smoker, and did unorthodox things, we're seeing Bond as he ought to be. (I never got into the garbage that was Brosnan's era, and there are only two Moore movies I find redeemable. Maybe three.) Dalton, naturally, is my favorite...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I figured as much.
The movie definitely had an open ending. Lots of questions left unanswered.

(Spoiler)

I never saw Vesper's betrayal coming. And none of the 007 gadgets. His car, though, was hawt!

Daniel Craig was a phenomenal Bond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've heard that Daniel Craig
does a pretty good job, but I lost interest in 007 years ago. I also think that, other than Sean Connery, taking that part seems to harm the careers of the actors who take it. They get type casted into that kind of role. Even S.C. didn't do much until he got older and more distinguished looking. And, Pierce Brosnan just can't seem to make a good movie anymore. Although I've heard he has a new movie coming out next year called "Butterfly on a Wheel" that might be pretty good.

http://www.iconmovies.net/butterfly/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He's sensatonal as Bond.
Some people (myself included) were not too sure about him, but he pulled one hell of a performance.

Brosnan's era is pop-culture garbage; wallowing in itself rather than taking a chance. That is another reason to give Casino Royale a try. It reinvents, stays true to the novel (by and large), and modernizes itself.

Definitely worth a DVD rental if nothing less, but it is a genuine big-screen theatre-worthy experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. average curious fan here...
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's not about the actor.
It's about the character and the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Which is also pretty exceptional.
:)

A couple of flibbles in my opinion, but not nearly enough to say "yet another modern Bond film that sucks".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I watched Die Another Day for the first time a few days before I saw it,
So I appreciate Casino Royale even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Before the flick turns sci-fi, Die Another Day is actually decent.
It had potential. But it ruined it, big-time. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. It started well.
But starting with the hospital scene, the acting and story are crap, which is shocking in light of who was involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Weissmuller was Tarzan and Connery was Bond.
Period.
End of story.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neoma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. More or less a fan.
Not much of one though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope to get to see it
but, i haven't seen so many movies the past 3 1/2 years, that I'll likely end up watching on DVD...

I like Bond movies, but since Moore took over, they've been too gadgety & gimmicky for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Saw it last night.
Very good, despite a few flaws.

Loved the fact that the tech is now pretty much modern, with no super-gadget BS.

And Judi Dench kicks butt as M. Glad they kept her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. I saw it, and it was abso-bloody-lutely fantastic.
First worthwhile Bond movie since GoldenEye, and the best (IMO) since the Connery days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Daniel Craig is a hypocrite
When he was filming this movie, he got on a soap box and said that guns should be illegal for anyone to own while making a movie about using guns to save the world.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. its a good movie
I saw it the first day it came to movie theaters and this Bond movie is more intense then the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Every new Bond since Roger Moore, studios always say "Finally, Bond done right"
My dirty little secret: I liked the Roger Moore Bond better. Moore's a little on the metrosexual side, but Connery played Bond as an outright misogynist. Moore at least seems to recognize how camp and over the top the whole business is--he's basically the Adam West of the Bonds. No one acknowledges it anymore, but everyone is still trying to get Bond out from under Moore's shadow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm going to see it as soon as I can.
I'm a huge Bond fan. I've heard all good things about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. I had reservations
But having seen the trailer, I'll see it...on DVD, since I gave up on the cinema (hear that all you fucking talkers!).

I like this recent trend of rebooting into grittier, more earthbound incarnations - Batman Returns and Battlestar Galactica (well not so literally earthbound with this one).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. Violent and very messy.
A better Bond than you've seen in a long time.

But you really, really, don't want to be licensed to kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. kickaroo
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC