grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:04 AM
Original message |
what do you think of this legal separation nuance? |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 02:09 AM by grasswire
I don't know if this is a quirk of (edited to remove the name of the state) family law or if it's just something set down in this particular circumstance (the husband is a relative of mine): The wife hired a lawyer. Then the husband and wife decided to seek an amicable trial separation instead of divorce. So they hired a lawyer who mediates separations -- but this turns out to be the lawyer originally hired by the wife. But the husband is NOT ALLOWED to talk to the lawyer alone.
Does that seem right? Members of the family believe this husband is about to get reamed. He is naive and not working to preserve any of his rights.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:06 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Sounds like hubby is gonna get hosed. |
|
If his wife is serious about an amicable trial separation, then she should agree to get another attorney. As for the attorney, shame on him/her. Smells like conflict of interest to me.
Do they have kids? If so, he should demand a different attorney, or get one of his own.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. yes, two young children |
|
He was told that he would be "allowed" to come over for dinner occasionally. Damn. He's gonna get hosed if he doesn't lawyer up.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. "Allowed"? No, no, no. |
|
He needs to get his own attorney, then. As long as neither he or his wife are abusive toward their children, or mistreating them in any way, they should both have frequent access to them. In this case, that should be carefully spelled out in a written, legal document, even if it is only a "trial" separation.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Thanks for corroborating what I feared.
|
SPKrazy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
Kutjara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:08 AM
Response to Original message |
2. He's going to get totally reamed. |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 02:09 AM by Kutjara
The lawyer is going to look after the wife's interests, not the husband's. It also seems as if the lawyer has a clear conflict of interest and should remove him/herself as mediator. The fact that he/she hasn't speaks volumes. I'd be surprised if the husband gets custody of his own colon after the divorce.
|
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:09 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Have the husband call the state's Ethics Bar. That seems like a conflict of |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 02:18 AM by MJDuncan1982
interest at best and possibly something a bit more sneaky at worst.
It may not be a problem if the wife did not employ the lawyer for a significant length of time and if the wife is also not allowed to talk to the lawyer alone.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Excellent suggestion, MJ. |
|
This attorney's motives need to be questioned.
|
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Thanks. They will have the answer. nt. |
Shakespeare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
20. It's absolutely a conflict of interest. |
|
You can't represent two parties who oppose each other (there's a gray area in real estate with dual agency, but NOT in family law).
He should have his own lawyer.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:14 AM
Response to Original message |
|
...can she shut him out of the home they both own?
Note: he has no issues that would make him seem any sort of danger at all. He will grovel to please her. She's an authoritarian personality.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. He would need to ask an attorney about that. |
|
Different states have different laws.
This is sounding like a really nasty situation brewing.
|
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Depends on the law...he definitely needs to get in touch with |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 02:19 AM by MJDuncan1982
a lawyer and the Ethics Bar (or tell the mediator that he is going to go to them and see if something comes out).
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. yeah, unfortunately........ |
|
....she has the family funds inaccessible to him and I don't think he can afford much for a lawyer.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. How did she manage that? |
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. he tied up all his money... |
|
...and borrowed money from his dad to get into a new home, which is draining all the cash. She is in the home; he has to vacate it at the end of the month at her request. He spent the last two years being Mr. Mom and working beneath his level while she developed her career, and relocating to accommodate her career. He just doesn't have much to fall back on right now.
|
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Hmm...can he back out of the mediation? |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 02:25 AM by MJDuncan1982
This is in no way legal advice but I would not want to accommodate my soon-to-be-ex in any way unless there was quid pro quo.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
...he is devastated and responding by trying to be so accommodating that he will earn "points" from her. The dynamic of the relationship is that she is the authoritarian and he feels compelled to try to please her. So now it's even worse, now that the home, the children, etc. are at risk.
What's especially mind-blowing is that he has discovered very high probability that she has been having an affair. She doesn't know that he knows it, and it hasn't been discussed between them.
Unfortunately, he's 3,000 miles away from his own family members and we are trying to be supportive long distance.
|
Crabby Appleton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 06:50 AM
Response to Original message |
18. He really needs to talk to a different lawyer |
|
sounds like a conflict to me.
|
Gormy Cuss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
19. He needs his own lawyer. Period. |
|
If he has to borrow money from everyone in the family to pay for it, that's what he needs to do. I had a sibling get screwed this way. After we ponied up the cash for a lawyer it was remarkable how quickly the situation changed to one with more balance.
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Hornswoggle in progress! |
|
Please ensure that your friend secures his own representation immediately. If the wife is telling him that he can't talk to the lawyer, then the lawyer is not working in his interest, and the settlement will not be "amicable."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |