MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:06 PM
Original message |
|
in the Anna Nicole case, the judge just gave custody of the body to the baby (via her guardian ad litem), without saying what has to be done with it.
3 days of entirely wasted court time.
|
MissB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Well, thank goodness that drivel is done. |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
the decision is so awful, that it's probably not over.
|
MissB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Just bury her already. |
|
Make them dig her up if they want to. I'd think a court would be a bit more cautious about digging up a buried body.
Of course, one of the many insane freaks in this case will probably file an appeal. Meanwhile, ANS rots slowly.
|
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No way was it a waste! |
|
It completely blotted out the NASA Astronaut Scandal and the war in Iraq... Just for starters.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Not to mention the whole Walter Reed thing..... |
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Walter Reed thing?
Please, what did I miss?
|
MissB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Um, the whole Walter Reed is below the armpit of appropriate care |
|
for our wounded soldiers.... big story this week.
|
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Dang, I'm actually usually pretty current on events.
Missed that one.
Thanks.
|
MissB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I was thinking sarcasm. |
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
But, with an undercurrent of outrage at all times.
Thanks again.
:)
|
MissB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. My detector isn't working too well. |
|
I was genuinely concerned about you, though. :rofl:
|
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. Just so we're perfectly clear on this... |
|
:sarcasm:
:D
Thanks for your genuine concern missb... You'd be surprised how much it means to me. :nosarcasm:
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
12. It's the perfect decision |
|
If he had given any weight to any adult over another, that would have carried into every other decision coming afterwards. Dannielynn is a valid next of kin and all the judge was asked to decide is WHO received the body - NOT where the body should go. He let everybody have their say and put everything out there, hear where everybody was coming from. Maybe they really will all come together for the baby from here on out. Would be nice.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
legally it's the right decision. i don't understand why it took 3 days of testimony regarding the baby's paternity, Anna's drug use, Howard Stern's sources of income, etc. etc.
It appears the body will be returned to the Bahamas now. The parties came to agreement in half an hour.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
spoke too soon.
The mother's filing an appeal.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
If she concedes that the baby is next of kin now, then that means she concedes it on the money later. Right?
I really think this should not be on tv and don't really care. But since it's stuck in my face, the legal matters are interesting to me. I would have liked to have praticed law.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. I think I would've liked the law, too |
|
at least studying it. Not sure about practicing it.
As for being on TV, I'm of two minds. On one hand, it's a public proceeding, AND it's interesting. On the other hand, I think it's a shame when lawyers pull pranks like one did today where she read Burkhead's email address live on TV. It would be nice if there were some way sanction lawyers who pull stunts like that.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
It seemed to me it had to do with whether she had made her wishes known and whether Stern had her confidence in making these decisions for her. Was he an abuser who had kept her isolated and drugged? If you're trying to decide whether Stern should be considered a spouse, whether it mattered where Dannielynn was going to live, whether she had reconciled with her mother, all kinds of things. I think he was a very strange judge, but considering the amount of money and those motivations, I think he was right to be very careful in this decision.
Aargh, the mom is going to appeal. What a shame. *sigh*
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. It's my understanding |
|
that Anna's wishes are essentially irrelevant. The body becomes property.
I guess the decision is who is next of kin - the mother or the daughter? I would assume states have laws defining the heirarchy, and I presume a child inherits before a parent.
I missed one part - who appointed a guardian ad litem for the baby? Stern was the executor of the estate, and presumably (at least in the Bahamas) the "father of record". Did Burkhead sue to have a guardian appointed?
|
Left Is Write
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. Her wishes are not irrelevant - |
|
essentially the decision was whether she had made her wishes clearly and credibly known, or would the body go to the next of kin.
As far as a GAL for the baby, I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing that when paternity is in question and the mother is incapacitated (or in this case, has passed away), a GAL would be standard. I don't know who appointed one for her.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
24. I didn't understand it that way |
|
I understood it that her wishes would be first, if they were legally stated. If she had a recent will that was above reproach, and it had said Stern makes all the decisions, then that would have been the end of it. That wasn't there which is why it was open for decision. As I understood it. I think the judge just appointed the guardian which is done almost any time a child has interests at odds with a parent or custody, etc. I think he did a good job laying the groundwork for the rest of the case.
|
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Well, he could have pulled a King Solomon... |
|
and that would have been the worst ever. :hi:
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
could've ordered the breasts be buried in California, where they're from.
|
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-22-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. Now... that would have been something. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |