eyesroll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-09-04 10:47 AM
Original message |
I just got my left-wing rant editorial vetoed by my boss! Ask me anything! |
|
(I'm in the process of toning it down and hoping I don't go too far in the other direction and emerge Pat Buchanan.)
|
grannylib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-09-04 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
1. What was the main point of the article? |
eyesroll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-09-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Why Bush's immigration program will ultimately be bad for the workers |
|
that my right-wing readers employ. And how there's a few of them that already exploit immigrants and won't do any better under the new plan.
|
Whitacre D_WI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-09-04 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
eyesroll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-09-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Whatever you're cooking n/t |
HEyHEY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-09-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Well, if any column should been pulled it's mine from this week. I did a column, intended to be humourous about the mad cow from Canada being economic pay back for softwood lumber.
I made fun of Bush, used the word cajones, and in general the editorial was shallow, poorly researched and crappy. He didn't say a thing, he thought it was funny.
|
eyesroll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-09-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I knew mine was going to be vetoed in full or in part |
|
At least now I have a little guidance. He's still letting me rant, but I have to make a case for why this is bad for my readers. Easier said than done. (I'm going with an "undermining competition" angle right now.)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message |