Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sitcom logic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 10:45 AM
Original message
Sitcom logic
1. When two characters go into the adjacent room, they talk in normal voices and act as if nobody else can hear them
2. Weddings ALWAYS take place in their home
3. The problem is always solved by the episode's end. Unless it's a 2 parter, in which case it happens by the end of it
4. Doesn't matter where they live; they're always wealthy despite having entry level jobs such as waiters
5. The same hospital lobby set is used as a hotel lobby
6. Matt LeBlanc is not funny
7. The family-themed sitcoms, since "Silver Spoons" onward, show punishment for misbehavior as a lovey-dovey talk and not even payback of the deed - this makes life confusing for impressionable children, who think their role models can get away with whatever they want
8. Fashions never last long
9. Everybody looks like a model or porn star
10. If it's on FOX, don't expect it to last more than 6 episodes

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with most of it except for Number 4...
In recent years they've stopped doing this. Roseanne, Friends, Grounded for Life....I realize they are all defunct now, but they all address not being able to afford stuff. And remember the Friends episode where Phoebe, Rachel and Joey get mad at Chandler, Monica, and Ross for never taking into account that they don't make much money, and always want to go someplace...nice? Roseanne was ALWAYS Broke.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I doubt that the characters on "Friends" could have afforded the rent.
Those apartments were HUGE for New York & the rent would have been equally huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. they did address that, although perhaps not adequately
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 11:18 AM by orangepeel68
Monica's apartment was rent controlled and still in the name of her grandmother. (There was an episode where they had to bribe the super not to turn them in). Chandler, apparently, made a lot of money doing some sort of job in logistics (which they were purposely vague about because none of the other characters understood it).

(I have way too good a memory for sitcom trivia. What a waste of brain space!)



edited because bribe and bride aren't the same thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Chandler prepared the WENIS report
Weekly Estimated Net Income Statistics :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In 1999, "Weekly" was acceptable. In 2007, they'd use "Primary"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. I did remember the WENIS
although I couldn't remember what it stood for. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. They were rent controlled and "sublet" from her grandmother.
Chandler made really good money doing whatever he did with the WENUS and paid for it.
I am a Friends GEEK!
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sitcom writers are monkeys with filing cabinets...
not monkeys with typewriters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't forget the "Sitcom Diet"
This consists of 2 carrot sticks, some celery and 5-7 peas, preferably among the rest of the family who are eating Porterhouse Steaks and mashed potatoes gravy, and corn on the cob with butter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. This goes back to earlier years.
Can anybody forget Herman Munster's "diet" in Low-Cal Munster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I think they all go back to I Love Lucy's and Honeymooners
You'd think they could update the concept a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. You're right, but the Thanksgiving rampage is definitely worthy of the Munsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. re: #6
Married With Children and the Simpsons are two of the longest running comedies on TV - both on Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. He only had guest spots on those shows, plus being a regular on the sensational "Top of the Heap",
and I needn't cite any more evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I'm sorry...
I meant #10, not #6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. And the old "I'm not speaking to you" charade
"I'm not speaking to you"

"Tell so and so, to pass the salt, I'm not speaking to them" etc etc

I liked when a Simpsons made fun of this when Homer and Lisa were fighting and not speaking to each other.

Over dinner, Homer got confused and stopped speaking to Marge after not speaking to Lisa. Marge had to correct Homer, "Homer, you are speaking to me..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nobody says "um" unless they are lying n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivan Sputnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Suspension of disbelief
is what they hope the audience will indulge in. They figure nobody wants to see shabby living conditions, even if the characters are supposedly poor. The sets have to be large, even for shows set in New York, so the camera crews can move around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTG of the PRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Isn't "sitcom logic" an oxymoron?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. #11 When two characters kiss, the studio audience brays a "Woooooo-OOOOOO!"
as if they've never seen people kiss before.

Especially prevalent in the poorer quality shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. #9 doesn't work on anything British.
British comedies tend to have more "realistic" people in them. Heck, British anything TV wise has more realistic people in them. Compare a British soap to an American one and my argument speaks for itself.

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC