SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:43 PM
Original message |
I fucking *hate* sudden death overtime. Hate it! |
|
And not because the Seahawks just lost to the Browns, but because it just sucks.
Wish they would do it like they do at the college level.
|
Bennyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I love the College way. The hawks lost to the Brownies today? WOW.....
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yup. Basically by a couple of inches on a 4th and 1 play. |
|
So, the Browns got the ball, and managed to get down to within field goal range.
I don't like it because it seems to add extra weight to any mistake, even the smallest one. I'd rather see each team get a more equal chance to win the game.
|
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I totally agree with you. |
|
There is no "bottom of the inning" in pro football.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I don't know why the NFL insists on this sudden death shit.
|
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Because they are evil and they hate us. |
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. If there was a bottom of the ninth in this game, it would have given |
|
the Browns the chance to win since they were the home team....
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Absolutely. But both teams would have had an equal chance at 3 outs. |
|
In sudden death OT in football, I don't think it's as fair.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
7. In this case at least the Seahawks had a chance with the ball. |
|
Their own fault they couldn't pick up half a yard - or punt, knowing they couldn't pick up half a yard.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Again, this isn't about the Seahawks losing; under the current rules, |
|
the Browns won fair and square, and I have no problem with that. No one cheated, so the win was good.
My complaint is with the system, the rules, as pertains to sudden death OT.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I'm not thrilled with the NFL system either. |
|
And while the college system has its merits, a hard-fought game that ends in regulation in 17-17 just shouldn't end up 39-37 or some other ridiculous score. Just feels wrong!
Maybe the NFL should copy the college system - BUT each team gets the ball at midfield, not at the opp 25.
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. That might be an idea. n/t |
Twillig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Such a shame that Seattle got their chance-- |
|
by winning the coin toss--and BLEW IT.
Went for it on Fourth Down and didn't get it.
You can't blame the NFL system for that!
Woooo-Hooooo!!
Great job Derek Anderson. Best damn Quarterback from the state of Oregon, and Oregon State, EVAR!!
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. One final time. I AM NOT COMPLAINING THAT SEATTLE LOST! |
|
Under current rules, Cleveland won fair and square. And yeah, Seattle blew it by not getting the down.
That. Is. Not. The. Issue.
|
Twillig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
I think they should play out the entire OT session. If it's a tie after that, TS!
|
TZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Last I had seen the Seahawks were winning like 21-7. Somewhere my Dad, Mr. Browns is very happy.... As for the overtime, I am kind of split on it...some of those college overtimes get crazy...and as someone whose team (Skins) have now won twice in sudden death overtime...well.....:shrug:
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Yeah, Hawks were doing well until the end. |
|
Then the Browns really picked it up, and ended up winning.
|
Presidentcokedupfratboy
(994 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And today, I hated it, too.
|
TZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
I do recall that the Jets had the ball first in OT ..they lost fair and square;)
|
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-04-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
I just want the rules changed a bit for OT.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |