LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 09:57 PM
Original message |
OMFG -- Rachael Rayjust called herself "Cinderrachael" |
|
Almost as bad as her "You're listening to RachaelRaydio" Dunkin' Doughnuts radioads.
:scared:
|
Kutjara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They really need to cut down her meds. |
|
She's gone right off the scale into lala land.
|
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It scares me that Starbucks Anarchist loves her |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Oh man, and I was starting to really like him, too :cry:
|
Starbucks Anarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Call someone who gives a damn. :P
|
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. That was so lame it caused me physical pain >_ |
Starbucks Anarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Hey, I had to come up with something, dingus. |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. You didn't know that?! |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Well, she is ATTRACTIVE... |
|
but there's nothing going on upstairs.
|
Kutjara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. That is indeed a worry. |
|
Perhaps he just has a penchant for the unhinged.
|
Starbucks Anarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If I had no class, I would refer to her as a Rachael Raytard... |
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-20-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
But I can't help laughing. :rofl:
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:bounce:
More Rachael please! :)
|
qnr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Aren't cinders kind of a bad thing for professional cooks? n/t |
IzaSparrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
10. why is she so spunky? |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Actually, according to tonight's episode, she's on scrumpy |
IzaSparrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-19-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
I have a bottle in my fridge.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-20-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-20-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |
19. How about Cinderdumbass |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-20-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. i saw some of the first episode of her talk show and had segment called-- |
|
are you ready?
"Ask the Rach"
swear to gawd.
|
Robeson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-20-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Oooooh. I think Rachael, I think booteylicious..... |
Kool Kitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-20-08 01:58 AM
Response to Original message |
23. I like the food that she makes, |
|
but it drives me nuts to listen to her. Since her shows are on Food Network at 6 p.m. weekdays, I have found a solution. Rachel Maddow's show is on at the same time here, and I find listening to her delightful. I mute the TV and turn up the radio. A Rachel solution for a Rachel problem.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |