Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would the world be like if people were different species,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:26 AM
Original message
What would the world be like if people were different species,

sort of like horses, donkeys, zebras, etc?

(I'm sure some SF writer has dealt with this...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can I be an ocelot?
I think they're keen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, that isn't exactly what I meant.

I meant like if humans were of different species, but they were all of human intelligence (?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Be a lot less grandchildren
Cross breeding between closely related species like horses and donkeys yields sterile offspring..Mules for example...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. LOL... good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I always found that strange...
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 09:44 AM by Chan790
why? I mean I know it's true.

Why doesn't it universally apply though? As I noted in another thread...an increasing number of cat breeds are hybridized (Bengals, for example) with no reproductive consequence. How does one near-species pairing create sterile hybrids when another creates fertile hybrids?

Edit: Another example. Dogs can interbreed with wild dogs, coyotes, and wolves. AFAIK none of these resultant hybrids are sterile, though some are self-limited and can only breed with a similar hybrid. Likewise, some intra-species pairs cannot breed at all. (certain breeds of dogs with other breeds of dogs.)

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't think these crossbreed babies aren't sterile....thats why their expensive I think
Ligers are sterile..If they aren't then these cats are probably not truly different species but perhaps subspecies instead...Some of these wild cats really are domestic cats that have just been feral for several generations I think...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. hmm...
I'll have to do some research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I've found parts of an answer...
Many late-branching canids (wolves, coyotes, dingos, dogs, jackals) can inter-breed to produce fertile offspring because they all have 78 chromosomes and are very-closely related. In the case of infertile pairings, the cause is often other biological or chromosomal incompatibilities resulting in miscarriage. (the source is Wikipedia so it's a "take with a grain of salt." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canid_hybrid)

Gender is a factor in hybridization. Male lions with female tigers produce ligers; Female lions with male tigers produce a completely different hybrid: tigons. One is massive, the other is barely larger than a medium-sized dog.

Also, apparently only one sex out of any closely-related hybrid is truly infertile. The other has limited fertility. For example, only male ligers and tigons are sterile. Females are fertile to parent-species with difficulty.

HALDANE'S RULE

Haldane's Rule states that in animal species whose gender is determined by sex chromosomes, when in the first cross offspring of two different animal species, one of the sexes is absent, rare or sterile, that sex is the heterogametic sex. The "heterogametic sex" is the one with two different sex chromosomes (e.g. X and Y); usually the male. The "homogametic sex" has two copies of one type of sex chromosome (e.g. X and X) and is usually the female.

Haldane's Rule for Hybrid Sterility states that a race of animals could diverge enough to be considered separate species, but could still mate to produce healthy hybrid offspring in a normal ratio of males and females. If any of the hybrid offspring were sterile, the sterile offspring would be the heterogametic offspring (males). If the heterogametic offspring was fertile, it produced the normal 50:50 ratio of X and Y sperm.

Haldane's Rule for Hybrid Inviability states that if the divergence between the species became large enough to generate genic differences, but not to prevent mating, then parental gene products may fail to co-operate during development of the embryo, resulting in hybrid inviability (the hybrids are aborted, stillborn or don't survive to maturity). In this case, the male to female ratio of hybrid offspring is skewed with more homogametic offspring while the heterogametic offspring (males) are absent or rare.


Source: http://www.messybeast.com/genetics/hybrid-cats.htm. I have no idea of the credentials of the author. However the larger site is very-deep with hybrid content...you might find it interesting reading if the topic is one in biology which intrigues you. There is also a brief discussion of chimeras as a means of creating cures for diseases there as well. http://www.messybeast.com/genetics/hybrid-mammals.html (It's the fourth paragraph under the heading chimeras. This is the same article as the one containing Haldane's Rule.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Hmmm interesting...
I will have to read more about it...Given my knowledge of genetics..(not my strong suit) this does sound like its plausible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. More war, more death, more racists, more slavery.
The ability to settle down, get married, get busy, and raise kids and grandkids really does wonders to support that 'we are all one' concept.

It's hard to hate the 'enemy' when your grandkids, or your relatives/friends grandkids are half 'enemy'.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Do you mean different species of humans
like if H. sapiens hadn't done away with H. neanderthalensis? or do you mean if there were different species with sapiency and societies equivalent to humans?

I could point you towards a couple interesting SF books based on your answers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I mean different species of humans like if H. sapiens hadn't done away with H. neanderthalensis. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. in that case
I recommend the novel Hominids by Robert Sawyer. It's quite interesting, although I admit I haven't read any of the sequels.

http://www.amazon.com/Hominids-Neanderthal-Parallax-Robert-Sawyer/dp/0765345005/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1216389054&sr=8-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. There's your answer.
Directly or indirectly, we did away with the competition. We fight wars over obscure religious doctrine and skin color, and barely tolerate different languages, for cryin' out loud.

If another human species appeared, it'd be us or them, I'm afraid. Fox News and their ilk would quickly brand them terrorists or heretics, or something, and off to war we'd happily go, secure in the slogans installed by our TVs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. At one point, there was.
Modern man briefly coexisted with Neanderthals ... until modern man wiped them out, of course. Using that as our model, it's logical to assume that, were there still more than one species of man, that situation would soon be rectified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. That would be my thought too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. I just watch the original Star Trek for my answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. How about 5 foot tall lizards? That find ginger an aphodisiac!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. There would only be one by now -countless wars would have made sure of it...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC