Why is always "beheading" and not "bebodying"?

[Rabrrrrrr]

How do we know it's always about cutting the head off the body, and not cutting the body from the head?

This kind of unrecognized prejudice pisses me off.

[Chan790]

1. Shouldn't the term be "debodying"?

:shrug:

[Rabrrrrrr]

2. Ya gotta go with the flow of the poetry, dude.

bebodying is funnier in this instance.

[MrCoffee]

3. It's a head-scratcher, Rabrrrrr

[stuntcat]

4. I dunno but I love the DISEMBOWLING idea

:headbang:


maybe reembowling would be the next question after that.

[Rabrrrrrr]

5. But why give all the focus to the bowels, you Hitlerian bigot.

Maybe it's discarcessing?

Sheesh.

[stuntcat]

6. "freeing"

the FREEING of the GUTS :headbang: bring on the freedom

[Rabrrrrrr]

7. It's about removing the oppressive bonds of confinement and LIBERATING THE BOWELS!!

Vive le Revolution!!

It's the same thing Moses did.

:P

[jobycom]

8. Absolutely. Why does the whole head and bowl removal have to be phrased negatively?

Why not Capitational Liberation, or Body Manumission, or Appendage Desubjugation?

Certainly the act of removing a person's bowels from the confinement of the restrictive muscle tissues incarcerating them can be expressed in terms of contribution rather than subtraction.

[Critters2]

11. It would be disemcarcassing. nt

[trof]

9. Why not de-head? I deheaded 10 lbs. of shrimp yesterday.

[stuntcat]

10. hey yeah..

aren't we all beheaded just by having heads??

[Shine]

12. I can see how that could piss you off.

there's always something with you, huh? :D

[Orrex]

13. Because after the execution, you'll beheading for the boneyard

In two boxes, perhaps.