Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Figured out why museums don't allow photography.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:07 PM
Original message
Figured out why museums don't allow photography.
Edited on Sat Aug-23-08 09:07 PM by arcadian
They'll tell you it's because the flash on the camera degrades the integrity of oil paints. :wtf: Sounds like bullshit, but could be true, I'm no physicist. No, it's because they don't want you casing the joint to come back to rob it. I was just at a rural house museum that had two very large Navajo rugs that I estimated to be worth about $30,000 a piece. No photography and security cameras and motion sensors everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, light does degrade all kinds of things
where were these rugs? I cringe when I think of the chewed up old saddle blankets in the barn - real Navajo stuff from the 40 and 50's. And still using the damn things on floors too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They were hanging on a wall.
They weren't old either, but they were enormous. One Ye'ii style, the other Ganado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I figured that
I meant where was the museum?:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Museums in Paris allow it...
Some don't allow the flash, like the Louvre, and the Picasso museum kinda frowns on it, but the D'Orsay does, except for the Degas pastel rooms, which are very dimly lit, to preserve the integrity of the drawings.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw the King Tut exhibit a few years ago in LA and no cameras were allowed.
and when i went to the Tate in London i don't think you take pics there either which was sad because they had the Pollack i really love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Wait. Is it the one that looks like spilled paint?
Couldn't resist. I like Pollack. I didn't know he was a WPA artist. I'm wondering where some of his public works are located.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Pollock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. it was! :-). I have a few different art books and there is a pollack section and
some Mondrian as well so when i got to the Tate and saw that one painting of Pollacks i've always really loved it was just so wonderful, same with the Mondrians. The Tate Moma had more than a few of his works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. They want to sell you prints and postcards and art books.
Those gift shops generate lots of cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, yeah... all of the above, but it really goes
back to flammable flash powder and bulbs from way back, and fire prevention.

Todays (meaning basically the last 50 years) flashes do not degrade anything faster than the lights they use, and have no fire hazard at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC