jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-08 07:26 PM
Original message |
* * * Asterisks: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Thread Promotion * * * |
|
It worked on you. :patriot:
|
Dr. Strange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Is this some kind of hoax? |
SOteric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-11-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Fuck. You weren't distracted by all the asteriskses? |
Ptah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A "yes" vote would grant "prospective buyers" a right to sue over a dwelling action, permitting lawsuits despite alternative dispute resolution provisions in sales contracts, shortening buyer purchaser notice and seller response period before and after filing defects lawsuit, requiring seller to inspect dwelling after receiving notice, requiring any seller offer to include repair or replace option that must be performed by a licensed contractor, eliminating seller right to receive attorney fees and costs if the seller prevails, mandating seller to provide ten year warranty of materials and workmanship, requiring newly constructed dwelling contract to include disclosure of seller's financial relationship with a financial institution, disallowing seller from requiring a buyer deposit unless contract allows 100 day cancellation period, extending from eight to ten years the time to file suit against any person making improvements to real property, and expanding remedies available to an owner who is successful in a dwelling action against the seller.
|
Unvanguard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Actually, it was the title that grabbed me. I go for anything with a word like "hermeneutics." |
bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-11-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Yes, but I'm not listening anymore
|
Chan790
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-11-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I clicked because it's so rare anybody uses the term "hermeneutics" even if the correctness of its' usage is debatable. You claim your asterisks are part of a hermeneutic paradigm...but what do they really tell us and how is it transformative unless you demonstrate how meta-meaning has changed by their inclusion? It's hardly the equal of the semiotics of jumping up and down like an idiot...that's universally understood everywhere and everytime regardless of linguistic barrier.
:bounce:
|
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-11-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. An impenetrable semantic fog tends to lend credibility to a worthless argument |
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-11-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Those darn asterisks got me again! |
|
Actually, it was the "jpgray" that got me to open the post. :-)
|
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-11-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Also referred to as "stars", "splats", and "Hales"... |
|
... after a man who had but one asterisk for his country.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |