Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-04 01:32 PM
Original message |
Since when did store mannequins sport nipples? |
|
Am I just really slow on the uptake? What need is there for such a blatant display of nipple? Do people look at the dummy and think 'well, I like that flimsy shirt, but how well would it obscure my nipples?' Huh? Huh? For the good of Christian God-fearing society, someone better tell John Ashcroft. First the Super Bowl, now this!
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Decades. They've been doing it for decades. |
|
I remember way back when it started, there was comment. LONG TIME AGO.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Man, I am slow on the uptake. |
Fenris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I, for one, think mannequins should have complete genitalia |
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. It's logical. It's anatomical. |
|
You look at the pants, and you think 'yeah, but how do the goods sit in there?'
|
ms_splash
(823 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
Fenris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Exactly. Pants are often tighter than they appear on mannequins |
|
And often there is that phenomenon that occurs when you sit down and the pants are too loose, when you get this weird bulge of fabric that looks like an erection. But it isn't; it's just that the pants are loose.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message |