Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is a front-load washer $1000 more than a top load model?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:10 AM
Original message
Why is a front-load washer $1000 more than a top load model?
Are they that much better? I've heard there are tax breaks in the stimulus plan if you replace your old appliances with new, energy efficient models. I've been wanting a new washer/dryer for a while and have started looking around.

Are the front loaders worth the extra coin?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know why they're more pricey, but I do know that my front-end loader uses much less water
and much less detergent. I lurrrrve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southpaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. They are all the rage, these days
You're less than nobody if you still use one of those (((shudder))) top-load washing machines.

:sarcasm: <--just in case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the washer and dryer have to match, and come in designer colors like:
Crayola Red or Crayola Orange or Crayola Yellow. And be like sparkling, pretty jewels (that no one but me will see because they're deep in my basement).

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Honestly I think they are a fad... and a pain in the ass. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Maybe a fad in the US, but we've had a front-loading washer for more than 10 years.
Edited on Thu Mar-05-09 10:42 AM by Heidi
:shrug:

ETA: Our front-loading washer leaves hardly any water in stuff after the final rise and spin. So, stuff dries more quickly -- and that's important because we stopped using an electric dryer several years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. We LOVE our front loader (and it cost about $600)
Edited on Thu Mar-05-09 10:28 AM by HarukaTheTrophyWife
We actually have the Frididaire (I think) stacking front loader HE washer & dryer. The washer is actually much smaller than many top-loaders, but it's capacity is higher.

If you put it on high-spin, the clothes come out barely wet and dry really fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. We have the GE version and they do work very well
I previously had an LG front-load combo washer/dryer which did a great job of washing clothes, and it was a full-sized washer, but because it only had a 120v electric condensing dryer, it took forever to dry. It was the largest machine that I could fit into my limited space and it worked great for a single person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Ours drys really good
The one feature I like is that if you start the washer and dryer at the same time, the cycles sync, so everything is done together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Our current GEs (pretty much the same as your Frigidaires" do the same thing
The washer is just a wee bit small compared to my old full-sized front-loader, but I've gotten used to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
59. We have a GE front loader and it's not very good
We bought it when it was a fairly new model, but I guess it's been a problem model for GE since then - it doesn't spin our clothes dry enough, either that, or it doesn't drain properly. (the problem develops after about a year...) Either way, clothes come out much too wet, and I need to run a 2nd cycle to "drain & spin" to get them more properly dry. Unfortunately, if you're washing delicate clothes, a high intensity spin isn't really good for them...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. I got front-loading Kenmore in 2002 for about $450.........
It uses a lot less water but it takes almost an hour to wash a load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. I ask the same question about bras
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. They use less water and are gentler on the clothes
I don't know which models you were comparing but when I bought mine it was $150/more than the mid-price range top loaders and I got a $75 rebate from the water district-- it was a pretty easy choice.

Front loaders mean that it takes a little less time for the clothes to dry because after the final spin there's much less water in the clothes too.

I wouldn't pay $1000 more for one, but a couple of hundred when there are rebates or tax breaks, sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I was just looking at this weeks Lowes ad
they have a top load washer for $1498 and a front load for $448 on the same page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well, that's one of the most expensive front-loaders
Mine was $600 at lowes and it's energy star compliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh, good. Thats much more within the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
57. I have the Whirlpool Duet
The model number is GHW9150P, although I don't think that one is still made. I think the equivalent is the WFW9400SW. It will probably run you in the $900 price range if you can find it on sale.

It might be worth checking Consumer Reports for the best model as I have heard some models have problems.

I'm quite happy with mine. We've had it for about 3 years now. My wife does a lot of laundry and the thing is running almost every day. We were wearing out cheaper washers on a regular basis and getting substandard results.

Over it's life cycle, a good front loader will probably pay for itself. They use less water and they spin the clothes much more effectively which results in less drying time. So unless you are hanging up your clothes, that alone will probably justify the higher cost.

A few things you need to know about them are you need to leave the door open when it's not in use so it dries out and you don't get mold problems. You will also need to clean out the detergent carrier about every 2 months or so, but it is designed to be removed and it cleans up in the sink pretty easily.

I won't ever go back to a toploader again. We have a regular dryer which is a Maytag gas model (which we are quite happy with also). I don't see much advantage to the matching dryers, but I don't have one so I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Look past the surface
http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=productDetail&productId=169269-2251-FTF530FS&lpage=none

If the link dosn't work, just look under "appliances" "washers and dryers" "washers" "400-600"

Frigidaire® 3.1 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer $598

You are just looking at what they decided to put on the front.

Then there is the GE Profile™ 4.0 Cu. Ft. Capacity King-Size Harmony™ Washer (Color: White) ENERGY STAR® for $1098
http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=productDetail&productId=169236-83-WPGT9360EWW&lpage=none
a top load for over 1k.

For curiosities sake, when you look at them, at the bottom of the description there is a link to the energy star ratings. You can see the expected difference in electric use. That does not count the lower water usage or any change in drying time(and thus electrical usage), potential benefits of a front loader that others have mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
53. We have the w and d mentioned in your first link
LOVE IT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. that machine might have a lot of stuff you don't use, i bought one that was pretty simple
they had a model by the same company that had lots of bells and whistles but i know i won't ever use them so spending another $500 seemed like a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. I LOVE MY FRONT LOADER! And it is the most basic one.
see this link:
http://www.sears.com/shc/s/s_10153_12605_Appliances_Washers+%26+Dryers_Front-Load


mine is the third one from the top. I have had it 5 or 6 years and it works great. Uses less water and soap, plus spins out water so well that they take less time to dry.

Gentler on clothes and much much easier on my back than reaching down into a deep well.

I did spring for the little stand thing, it made it the perfect height.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. Because it's fancy.
That must be it, I guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. i got mine for about $800 after 2 rebates. It uses way less water and detergent.
my water bill has gone down by about 0% since i got a new dishwasher and washing machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. Depends on how much washing you do.
We would have to use a front loader for about 20 years to break even on the cost vs energy and water savings. I'll stick with driver we got used for $50 back in 1982 and the washer we got for $100 6 years ago. Total maintenance cost on both of them is about $350 and 200 of that was to replace the hoses that the damn rat we had in the garage last year ate. We wash about 3 loads a week on the average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipfilter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. My FL dryer is not Energy Star
but the washer is. The dryer only takes about 40 minutes so it still uses way less energy than my previous dryer.

If nothing else, the FL washers are just fun to watch when they go into their spin cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. The first night we had ours, LostinVA and I stood down in the basement for about half an hour
just watching it spin. I never thought a day would come where I'm standing there with a beer, watching the washing machine, and going, "isn't it beautiful?"

And we had a really scary Stephen King basement in that house. It even had a room accessed only by a hole in a rock wall. We never went in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipfilter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. It was a source of amusement in my house
for about a week. It's a big let down when your waiting for the spin cycle and it has to stop and rebalance the load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. OMG, I thought we were the only ones who did that.
My daughter, granddaughter and I sat in the basement and watched our FL wash the very first load. We spent 60 minutes laughing that yes were were actually watching a washing machine and ooing and saying "isn't it cool". :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
44. I volunteer at a homeless shelter that got a new FL washer,
and two months ago, I was working the middle-of-the-night shift, doing laundry...and found myself watching the washer. I was glad all the clients were asleep. They may have been scared by the crazy lady being amused by the washing machine! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #26
54. hehehehehhe -- Haruka and I did that, as she says upthread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. We bought a Kenmore frontloader for less than $500, new, from Sears.
You're not shopping wisely if you think you have to pay $1200 for a frontloader.

We did our homework with Consumer Reports, and bought a Kenmore frontloader in 2002. We were able to negotiate on the price because we purchased five major appliances at the same time.

It looks identical to this model: http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_12605_02640412000P?vName=Appliances&cName=Washers+%26+Dryers&sName=Front-Load


Yes, a front loader is worth a little extra money. However, the amount you're quoting is not realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. I'm quoting prices straight off this week's Lowes ad
apparently they advertise the extreme high end model next to the starter machine.

I've just started looking. Thanks for the recommendation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Consumer Reports online membership is worth the fee for one month.
Using the online CR product reports and doing some homework showed us how to get some great appliances for very reasonable prices. If you are in the market for a new washing machine, I highly recommend using CR to research brands and models.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. never had a problem with my Kenmore's
I still have a TL, we bought the W&D set 13 years ago for 300 bucks. Works like a charm. My mom's set is over 20 years old. If I had the money to replace them for a front loader, I'd do it, and I'd stick with Kenmore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. one more thing, when i bought my washer and dryer i did not get the pedestals, that changed
Edited on Thu Mar-05-09 11:29 AM by AlCzervik
after about a month because my back was killing me, i got the 15 inch pedestals and it made a world of difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. That was going to be my next question!
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. i learned the hard way, i got the higher pedestals so now i can clothes out
and put them directly on the counter behind me without wrenching my back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. We love ours, paid around $650 for it.
We bought an LG for around $650 about 18 months ago and not only has it reduced our water consumption it's also reduced our gas bill.

This is the one we have:
http://reviews.cnet.com/washers/lg-tromm-wm2016cw-freestanding/4505-17904_7-33016699.html

Some things to keep in mind. They take longer to wash a load of clothes but it takes less time to dry. After a load, we keep the door open on ours since it's in the basement. I've heard of some problems with front loaders having mildew odor problems from around the seal. One of my sons had the problem with one they bought but they were keeping the door closed when not in use.

There also may be issues if you place them on a first floor/wooden floor. They can walk from the vibrations. My son had to reinforce his laundry room floor to get his to stop. Ours is in the basement and we have no problems like that. I also don't have a pedestal and I don't find it anymore difficult that reaching down into a top loader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hate the POS... We have the crappy European models here... breaks constantly
We have gone through 3 in six years. Thankfully, it is part of our housing. Also, front loaders only come in small sizes.

Give me a hefty size top loader and a REAL American dryer any day. UGGG, what's worse are the sorry European style evaporative dryers. They take forever and consequently cannot be very energy efficient. Bad all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Do you have the combo model?
The one that is both washer and dryer?
If you do then you are so right.They are the biggest peices of shit ever.
It would take me over six hours to wash and dry a single load.On top of that it was always scorching my clothes because of how on the dry cycle it does not spin for the whole cycle.

What sucks is it is a good idea to combine them.How they went about it completely sucks though.An example of extremely piss poor engineering,imo.

To the OP-US style front loaders,ime,are pretty good.They use less water and detergent and you can stuff a lot more clothes into one then you can in a top loader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. We have that, but also a separate dryer... ok I will end my rant about euro appliances now
Nothing beats the stuff built to American specs!

they can install my Italian built machine in a FIAT for all I care!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
49. Since European housing in a lot of places (definitely UK) is a lot smaller than US housing...
... it's definitely attractive to have a single washer/dryer combination machine. Never had one... but the ones I had in the UK weren't too bad. Best thing to do with them is to use them daily, at night, on the off-peak electricity. They actually do get the clothes very clean. Then in the morning, hang the clothes out to dry, pray for dry weather, go to work. Come home: clean clothes. You've saved a bundle in electric costs and you've been kind to the environment (not using electric to dry clothes). However if it rains, then you can use the dryer... if you're frugal you could in theory let the clothes sit in the washing machine until the next night and go for it then... or just shove it in the dryer and hope lots are done before 9am when peak time electric comes on.

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. The ones I used in Europe
would not let you stop the dryer cycle.
Once you started the wash it had to go through the complete cycle.
For some reason they had set them up so that the door stayed locked from beginning to end.A co-worker tried to get it open after the wash and ended up breaking the locking mechanism and ruining the machine.

Like any front loading washer they did do a great job cleaning the clothes.It was the drying part that really reeked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
62. I have one of those.
The washer part is fine, I have no trouble with that. The dryer-OY. I have used it twice, both times I set it for 30 minutes, cos if you just put it on "normal" dry, it takes almost THREE HOURS! Now I just wash and hang dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Here's a reason why I HATE my front loader
You can't soak your clothes. I really liked soaking my whites before running the cycle. I miss it terribly. My front loader has been a PITA and we frequently have to open up the entire front to clean out the little tray underneath because god forbid a few pine needles go through the wash and get stuck in there. We learned how to do it ourselves after a 100 dollar visit from the repair guy. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Mine has a soak feature
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. much better!
when I switched to FL my water bill dropped significantly - AND - my (then) husband and even my little boys noticed that the clothes were cleaner and softer.

When you think about it swirling clothes around in already dirty water doesn't make any sense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. My wife used to wear a front loader when we were dating
its much better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
38. I prefer the topless models
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
42. I paid about the same for my front load Frigidaire washer as for the top load
But it was a scratch & dent model previous year model on clearance. It's the one step up from the bottom model for that year and it works great. MUCH quieter than any top load washer we've ever owned. And it is supposed to use about 1/4 the water than the equivalent top loader.

Mine isn't one of the designer models in cool colors, either. Just a basic white front loader washer. Same for the "matching" model dryer which was also a clearance year end dented model.

My laundry/mud room is not a show place so why should I care if there is a dent in the service panel or a scratch on the side where it will never been seen? I saved nearly 50% of the list price on those appliances and that was more important to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
43. The more expensive front loaders have
(1) A direct drive motor system to turn the drum, rather than a cheaper belt drive system. The DD system allows the drum to spin at very high speed (1000 rpm), which extracts much more water from the clothes and allows them to dry faster.

(2) A built in water heater so you don't use up all your hot water from your regular system.

(3) A stainless steel drum.

All these things cost more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Plus enough internal computerization to do really customized cycles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Yes, forgot about those, thanks.
What do you own, and are you happy with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Oh, my house doesn't have hookups.
But I had a job selling appliances before my kid was born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. OK, thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. Thank you for your response
I'm glad to know the motor is more heavy duty in the front loaders. That would make a big difference in the cost -- not just that they are 'in fashion' and therefore cost more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
52. Our front-loader was about $150 more, and it is worth it
Cleaner clothes, WAY less water used, way less power used, more room in drum, newer models stackable but full-size, some cities give you a tax rebate to use them.

It shouldn't be that much more at all. We have Fridgedaire front-loader asaher and dryers, and the fl models were about $100-150 more. WORTH IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
55. Because it's an LG
I have NO idea whatsoever how LG gets away with charging $1500 for a washer, but they seem to sell a shitload of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
56. If you have the coin get a Staber.
American made. Easy to fix yourself. Top loading but works like a front loader. Uses very little water and almost NO detergent. They are pricey but you will never buy another washer. My dream!
http://www.staber.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Neat! Thanks....
Edited on Sat Mar-07-09 12:00 AM by MicaelS
Saw those being made on an episode of "How Things Are Made." Wondered what brand it was, now I know.

EDIT: Whoa! Went to their website and says:
It is designed to be end user repairable, even if you are not ‘mechanically-inclined’. There is total front access to the parts, no transmission to worry about, and fewer overall moving parts. We do not require authorized service people.

Wow, how many products can you say THAT about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
58. You can get a good sized front-loader for under $1,000 total
so, unless top loaders are free, I don't think there is that big a price difference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
61. They use less water and energy and they last longer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC