rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 09:55 AM
Original message |
This birther on Stephanie Miller sounds drunk at 9AM |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
Gidney N Cloyd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I'm not listening now but I think that's someone into the Obama birth certificate issue. |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
av8rdave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. I have a friend whose wife is still into that |
|
Apparently, a legal birth certificate is insufficient proof of where you were born. Sheesh!
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Well hm... you just reminded me of something... |
|
a co-worker was recently talking about the adoption process he's going through, and he said the state of TX generated new birth certificates for his adopted children, claiming they were born in TX. Supposedly so they can get SS#'s? I dunno... this is second-hand, so... anyway, maybe that's what's feeding this?
Sounds like the dumbest thing ever.
|
av8rdave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Wouldn't a newly issued birth certificate say so on the certificate, or at least there would be a paper trail on the date?
I'm no expert on this stuff.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I would think so yeah. |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 12:52 PM by redqueen
And it's most likely different for adoptions vs. live births.
But then... you have to remember who we're dealing with here. Logic ain't their strong suit.
|
av8rdave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Oh, I know...this lady is still convinced he's a secret Muslim |
|
Not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. Dunno about that, but infant adoptions hide certain info on the birth certificate |
|
for obvious reasons. They fill in the names of the adopting parents, leave off the hospital you were born at, stuff like that. At least, in Louisiana 44 years ago that's what they did.
Since you need a birth certificate to get an SS # or enroll in school or get a driver's license, Texas is probably issuing BCs that won't lead back to the biological procreaters, putting the adopting parents' names on the certificate.
Obama wasn't adopted, though.
|
bullwinkle428
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
4. "I do my research...it's all on the Internet!!" |
SoxFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. David Icke will be glad to hear this! |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 01:36 PM by SoxFan
http://www.davidicke.com/index.php/Hey, Barack Obama and George Bush are shape-shifting Reptillians from another realm of the space-time continuum. I saw it on the internet, so it must be true.
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-30-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
10. That's completely unfair. |
|
West coast, that's six a.m. Or four a.m., Hawaii.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |