Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Application for a Marriage License in the State of MN has this statement at the bottom...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:28 PM
Original message
The Application for a Marriage License in the State of MN has this statement at the bottom...
Right above where the Groom and Bride sign, it states:

"...and one of the applicants is a man and the other is a woman."

Apparently, the fundies have had some influence upon this...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about goats?
I thought MN allowed goats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fundies like goats
they are not worried about someone wanting to marry a goat, apparently...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Goats are awesome
but I have to draw the line at box turtles. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good luck consummating THAT marriage...
:rofl:

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Better a box turtle than a snapping turtle.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. IBTL...
Dood, hit it from BEHIND... Everyone knows that...

:rofl:

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought they were into beastiality and scat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ewww, gross.
Choose one or the other. Not both! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. I applied for a marriage license in MN twice - once in 1987 and once in 1997.
I don't remember if that wording was on it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. and sadly
neither of those times you were marrying me...

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Serious question...
Does anyone know of cases where transgenders have been prevented from getting married to a member of their original (not assigned) sex?

What is the fundie position about this? Would such a marriage be legal in states that prohibit same-sex marriage?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Absolutely no idea
but I guess the fundies would be against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well...I only got married one of those times.
(Besides, how old were you in 1987?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. uhmmm
What about 1997?

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Hmmmm....
this is the second time you've avoided my direct questioning of how old you are...

:)

1997 was when I did the actual getting married thing.

It was a whim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I am 33
years old, and in my prime...:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So, yeah...
You'd have been a little young to marry me in 1987. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Even in 1987
I was capable of appreciating beauty and intelligence...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. ???
I was 22 in 1987.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Men are the "one," women are the "other."
Don't tell me sexism isn't thriving in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. It does clearly show that they offically consider the default for a person
to be male, and women to be something other and different. :(

That really tells you something about how ingrained sexism is that their official language shows it so casually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. but do they check?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It has to be signed in person
in front of the Notary, so I think it would be pretty obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. well, if you had two slightly androgynous folks
Edited on Mon May-11-09 10:37 PM by Muttocracy
e.g., girl with short hair, boy with long hair, androgynous clothes, etc.

Would they do a strip search?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC