hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 01:57 PM
Original message |
Now that Star Trek has been re-booted - isn't it time for someone |
|
to do the Star Wars saga properly - like with a good script and decent actors?
|
orestes
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Don't give Lucas any ideas |
|
He might decide he should be doing the rebooting
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. He already did. In 1977... |
|
He tacked on "Episode 4" once the movie had become a hit, which Lucas was unsure of because, despite the gloss, he was worried people would be bored with the plot. (I was, but I'm a nerd. A real nerd. A real dateless badge-certified nerd.)
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Well, it wouldn't do much to make a better script... |
|
Save for "The Empire Strikes Back", which is actually pretty damn good...
And decent actors - not A-list celebrities either... I may not like NuTrek's plot (what there is of one, which also seems to whiz on Gene Roddenberry but whatever), and the product placement ads were sickening, but the choice of actors was very good. Even Simon Pegg, who had troubles trying to act AND do the accent at the same time, was good. Then again, we didn't see him too much...
|
EastTennesseeDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. You have to make some sacrifices when you're using such a huge budget |
|
For example, Winona Ryder provided the entire wardrobe for Star Trek. That freed up a couple million bucks.
Star Wars doesn't have that luxury.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I know a guy who already has the rewrite for "The Empire Strikes Back". |
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
6. This time around, no cute Ewoks. Either mean and nasty tough Ewoks |
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
WildEyedLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-25-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
8. The original trilogy was fine |
|
Campy at times, sure, but that's sort of part and parcel for a PG-rated kid-friendly saga.
Now, the prequels? Yes, please.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message |