so, why the hell SHOULDNT condi testify?

[LastKnight]

white house spokespeople say that condi and similar level bush admin officials shouldnt have to publicly testify under oath. why the hell not? hiding something? afraid of the truth? aaagh random rant over, sorry.

-LK

[acmavm]

1. This government was intended to be 'of the people, for the people, and

by the people'. With that in mind, there is absolutely no reason that any of them have the legitimate right to refuse to testify about anything. The problem that we've had since Reagan is that no elected leader has had the integrity, decency, or guts to remind these idiots of that fact, unless the issue is whether or not they're 'getting a little on the side'. Now there's an issue that they can dig into.

I'm not saying that what Clinton did was right, it wasn't. But it was with a consenting adult who just happened to be an opportunistic floozy. And the only judgement and punishment he had coming was from his wife. And I'll bet she made his life miserable for a good long time.

Maybe I'm crazy, but I prefer a man who dabbles with a female trollop that an delusional idiot who contrives to start a war with a 'whore' willing to cause the deaths of a lot of innocent civilians and American troops just so he can become the King of Iraq.