Call Me Wesley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 09:27 AM
Original message |
In the movie, couldn't Cameron just have disabled the Titanic instead of sinking it? |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-30-10 09:48 AM by Call Me Wesley
Then he could have done a sequel. :P
|
Dr. Strange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
Call Me Wesley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
Ptah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Thanks for the laugh, CWM
:applause:
|
Call Me Wesley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. They'd still be floating in the Atlantic, |
|
with many good stories in there. ;)
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
3. This is my problem with the whole war on icebergs thing. |
Call Me Wesley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
They could have gave up the ship and settled on the iceberg. Like LOST, only freezing.
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. and a damn fine idea at that! |
edbermac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
8. And another nude scene for Winslet. |
Call Me Wesley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-30-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |