Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grammar pet peeve: Literally means literally!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:31 PM
Original message
Grammar pet peeve: Literally means literally!
The Oatmeal (quickly becoming one of my favorite webcomics) gets it:

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/literally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're literally preaching to the choir.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. But epistemologically, does it literally MEAN literally?
Or does it just represent the concept of literalness, while having no literal meaning of its own aside from what has historically been applied to it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You just blew my mind. Literally. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a blog out there, somewhere, dedicated to chronicalling abuses of the word "literally"
Incredibly, it's not named "Literally Speaking," which I literally took as a given. It's literally named "Literally, A Web Log" and you will literally laugh yourself to death (if you try to read it while driving).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gayroller
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. God, last week when the explosion happened
some anchorbot said "It's literally apocalyptic."

No it's not, you moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. It annoys me to no end on how people literally abuse that word now.
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayakjohnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm right there with you.
But not literally, of course.

It would be a bit more obvious if I were.

Literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's literally just a generic intensifier these days
—Usage note
Since the early 20th century, literally has been widely used as an intensifier meaning “in effect, virtually,” a sense that contradicts the earlier meaning “actually, without exaggeration”: The senator was literally buried alive in the Iowa primaries. The parties were literally trading horses in an effort to reach a compromise. The use is often criticized; nevertheless, it appears in all but the most carefully edited writing. Although this use of literally irritates some, it probably neither distorts nor enhances the intended meaning of the sentences in which it occurs. The same might often be said of the use of literally in its earlier sense “actually”: The garrison was literally wiped out: no one survived.

Mad TV cared: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC2QGojQnUY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Reminds me of the dictionary skit
they did on SNL a year or so ago. They had changing of the definitions, the also said that "bitch" is now a term of endearment. One of them was changing the definition of literally. They also rolled a list of names, similar to the way the Oscars run the name of deaths to music and applause after each name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cemaphonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. My pet peeve - People complaining about "literally"
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 07:59 PM by cemaphonic
I get why some people find it annoying, especially since many of the more convienient synonyms for literally have also become intensifiers. But people who complain about it often seem to think that it is some newfangled corruption of the English language that only the ignorant would use, when it actually(!) has a pedigree of a few hundred years, and has been used by some of the most celebrated writers.

Interesting discussion here:
http://www.slate.com/id/2129105/

OTOH, the comic is funny, and not the only one on the subject:
http://xkcd.com/725/

My favorite comic from The Oatmeal:
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling

Especially the bit about the panda at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. My 11 year old says "literately."
I try not to pick on her when she does. I succeed sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC