Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Illinois poll...Bush in trouble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 11:59 AM
Original message
Illinois poll...Bush in trouble
My home state of Illinois is a bell weather state....so this spells trouble for Bush in the midwest and elsewhere.


Tribune link

Economy, Iraq hurt Bush in state poll

By Rick Pearson
Tribune political reporter
Published October 26, 2003

Illinois voters have soured so dramatically on President Bush, his handling of the economy and his Iraq policy that half say they don't want to see him re-elected next year while fewer than four in 10 say they do, a new Tribune/WGN-TV poll shows. Bush's nose dive in popularity has been so precipitous that, in just four months, his approval rating among Illinois voters has dropped from 57 percent to 46 percent, the poll found. Over the same time, the share of voters who say they disapprove of the job he's doing as president has climbed from 34 percent to 44 percent.

(snip)
Big change since 2002

In an April 2002 Tribune/WGN-TV survey, 56 percent of Illinois voters approved of the way Bush handled the economy, compared with 32 percent who disapproved. Now, 54 percent of voters in the state disapprove while 34 percent voice support for Bush's economic stewardship. Among the key voting bloc of independents, 57 percent disapprove of his performance on the economy while only 28 percent back his efforts. In a state that had a total unemployment of nearly 460,000 people last month, voters indicated they had little faith in Bush's ability to solve the nation's economic and job woes. More than half said they had little or no confidence that Bush could turn things around compared with 42 percent who had at least some confidence.

Another negative factor for Bush are poll results showing that, by a 2-1 ratio, more voters believe they are worse off financially now than compared to a year ago. That ratio, underscoring the key personal pocketbook concerns that voters have, has basically remained unchanged for the last two years.

(snip)

By 47 percent to 43 percent, voters disapproved of Bush's handling of the situation in Iraq. And voters were split 46 percent to 43 percent in the belief that U.S. military action in Iraq was warranted. While a strong majority of voters--55 percent :shrug:to 32 percent--said they believed Iraq under Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction shortly before the war began, a narrow plurality--47 percent to 43 percent--said they believed the Bush administration overstated the threat of Iraqi weapons.

Despite Bush's call for patience in policing and rebuilding Iraq, 42 percent of the voters said it was time to reduce the U.S. military presence there, compared with 27 percent who said military strength should remain the same and 17 percent who said it should be increased.

Iraq funding unpopular

An overwhelming majority of voters--62 percent--disapproved of the Bush administration's request for $87 billion to pay for military activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, a request that also included nearly $20 billion for reconstruction of Iraq. Only 29 percent said they supported the president's spending request.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh goody goody
makeing it harder and harder for diebold's rigged vote scam to work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Come on... there is always the "undecided voters" who decide
to vote for Bush.
Or the Democrats who don't show up.
Or whatever they want to say. There is always the SCOTUS alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yay!
I'm also in IL--- the Repuke part, even--- and even *I* am hearing deep discontent with * and his evil minions... :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does Illinois use DIEBOLD?
If so, Bush already won it, and it doesn't matter what the scientific polls say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's up to each county.
The State does not mandate which provider a county use, only that it be 2002 certified. Ours SOS is a rabid Dem, so there won't be any 'Diebolding' of the vote in IL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Illinois should be a safe state for us in 2004 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's amazing that anyone still approves of this admin.
But it is good that the people are starting to catch on. We need to win Illinois. We need people to see that Bush* has ruined everything. We need someone to start an inquiry into the voting machines. Dems need to keep reminding people about the $87bn. It's always money that has the biggest impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. we *will* win IL, just like we did the last 3 times.
What little support * has here is melting like the Wicked Witch....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. good
Democrats need states where we don't have to spend considerable time and money and Illinois is a big state in a key region that is looking promising. Hopefully it will stay that way. I think the midwest will be competitive but Illinois will hopefully be our anchor state and we can concentrate instead on Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Missouri, and Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC