While trying to explain WHY I believe that Clark is a Bush set up to take the reins of power on behalf of the BFEE I did a little more research on Bush and the Stephens group of Arkansas.
Clark went straight to work for Stephens and was hired with money supplied by the Axciom group, apparently - according to this article:
http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:K9v3MBclXA0J:washingtontimes.com/national/20030929-123112-7749r.htm+%22Warren+Stephens%22++Clark&hl=en&ie=UTF-8Of course this is a Washington (Moonie) Times article. But what matters is NOT the spin but the facts.
Right wing rags are ALWAYS used in blackops to make a rightist LOOK like a leftie (i.e. when Rush and the Moonies attack Clark it builds up his credibility with the left). This Machiavellian tactic is as old as history. It is the Bre'r rabbit approach: "PLEEZE Don't elect that mean ol Lib'rul, you commie bastids!!!" In this piece the Times is critical of Clark but the facts are dead on. Because this is a Moonie spin machine the conclusion must be by the left that the facts are wrong or the spin is wrong. They have no credibility. That is why Rove uses such rags to leak the truth about his own spooks.
Anyway - don't shoot me. The fact is that the Stephens group owner, Warren Stephens, hired Clark for $300,000 just after he gave Bush $100,000 for the 2001 inauguration. Do you think Stephens is so dumb as to sponsor an OPPONENT of Bush or was Clark hired to be Bush's tag team political partner.
Bush is on the ropes and he needs someone to hand the battle over to.
That man is Clark.
Google Warren Stephens and Clark and Bush if you doubt that my facts are correct.
And yes - Stephens ALSO financed Clinton AFTER he helped arrange Saudi financing for Shrub in the Harken deal.
That is why the Clintons are backing Clark.
I am SO sick of the Arkansas-Texas mafias.