helleborient
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-13-03 11:37 AM
Original message |
George Will screed against Howard Dean... |
|
This at least challenges the notion that Republicans want Dean to be nominated. George Will certainly does not. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34413-2003Nov12.html
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-13-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
1. but not one word of criticism of The Mighty Emperor Shrub |
|
for opting out of public funding.
this piece says absolutely nothing.
a-hole.
|
helleborient
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-13-03 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. George Will wouldn't criticize Bush... |
|
He is permanently of the right-wing.
I posted this to demonstrate what is being said about Howard Dean by "distinguished" members of the right-wing, because there seems to be a notion here among money that Howard Dean is supported by Republicans.
|
madddog
(302 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-13-03 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-13-03 11:51 AM by madddog
George has outdone himself this time...wtf was his point? I THINK this is a rant about the McCain/Feingold campaign finance bill...but I can't be sure lol.
|
bread_and_roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-13-03 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
4. George Will is using the opt-out |
|
of public financing to invalidate the entire concept of campaign finance reform - something I consider far more important to democracy than which Dem gets the nomination. He is using it to validate the "money is free speech" arguement. This is going to come back to haunt us, to the detriment of future candidates and the detriment of representative government.
|
el_gato
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-13-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. george will can rot in hell |
|
I won't bother reading whatever trash he's peddling.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |