carpetbagger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 12:46 AM
Original message |
|
https://secure.clark04.com/indexVideo.php and click on the speed/format under the TV screen. Wes Clark would cut the GOP down to size.
|
kalashnikov
(257 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 12:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
but his ad seems so sappy.
|
SahaleArm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Sappy is good for political ads. |
|
Especially in NH. It's a well produced ad that gives people a glimpse of the candidate.
|
Jerseycoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
You both thought it was sappy? I thought it was sexy.
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. It was beautiful on every level. I could not have believed... |
|
that an ad touting his military career could be so beautiful.
|
kalashnikov
(257 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I think they should have a scene of him machine gunning effigies of the fox news anchors while screaming like a maniac "WEST POINT! RHODES SCHOLAR! GENERAL! SILVER STAR! DEMOCRAT! HAHAHAHAHA!"
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-18-03 01:40 AM by Bleachers7
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
Punkingal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 01:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I thought having the word "responsibility" up was very good. Reminds people Chimpy never accepts responsibility.
|
Feanorcurufinwe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 01:51 AM
Response to Original message |
8. A good first ad for Clark. |
HoosierClarkie
(504 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Top 10 Reasons Clark Will Win in 04. He's on Letterman this week. |
|
Before I write this let me just tell you that I am 26 years old and never voted before or been politically active in anyway. I have been inspired by Clark. Never would I have imagined that I would be writting letters to people or canvassing door-to-door in the freezing cold. Have I gone nuts? No. Simply, Clark's conviction for this country and the great people in it is just contagious! He brings people like me in and that is what needs to happen for the Democratic Party. I am new at this so please do not beat me up. I just thought these were funny. I am no David Letterman, but I am from Muncie,IN :)
TOP 10 REASONS CLARK WILL WIN IN 04! 10) because the only time he says "bring it on" is when he is talking to Fox! 9) because someone thinks voters can not remember that phrase "I am a son of a mill worker"! 8) because he doesn't believe in rolling up his sleeves to his armpits! 7) because not only can he spell Slobodan Milosevic, but he can pronounce it too! 6) because his Military Uniform is government issued, not Rove issued! 5) because those other guys are terrorizing each other! 4) because "compassionate conservative" is not in the dictionary! 3) because he wrote the book on "Winning Modern War"! 2)because that one guys favorite beer actually is bush light! 1)because Wes believes War should be the "last resort", but DON'T YOU DARE TWIST HIS WORDS!
Like I said I just thought these were funny. :) By the way I love his TV ad.
|
YankeyMCC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
I too am a first timer.
I'm a vet, a home owner, and a father. I've always voted and followed the issues pretty much. But this is the first time I've gotten involved in a campaign. It's the first time I've felt like I have someone I am sure will be a good president, a good leader, instead of my usual "settling for the least damaging person".
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Hope you enjoy your stay!
As to your post. Its good to see so many people getting involved and fired up by our democratic field. I have a growing sense that bush is going down hard in 2004 no matter who we choose as a candidate.
Wesley isnt my guy. But I am happy just the same to see people motivated to get bush out and if wes does get the nod I will do all I can to see he gets the job done.
|
HoosierClarkie
(504 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
GOPBasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
17. Those were funny as hell! |
|
I'm so glad Clark has brought you on board. That's the reason I think he'd be our best chance to beat Bush: he'll get many new voters.
|
Jack_Dawson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I've never been more sold on a candidate in my 34 years. This guy is so the real deal that sometimes words fail me.
I can't believe how many of you are playing right into the Rove's master plan. Who would YOU rather go up against? A skiing, draft-deferring trust fund baby or a war hero? WAKE UP!!!
|
GOPBasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
indigo32
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I thought it was perfect |
|
does what it needs to do.
|
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-03 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
19. He is the man. Former Alderman in New Hampshire told us: |
|
I quit my job in disgust when W was installed - I didn't want to have to do with government. Once Wes declared, I returned - never been more hopeful" I must say, I feel the same. This is the guy who will testify against Milosevic in Hague next month. Can you see the prestige in this?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message |