Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We Are All the Prolitariat (Dupe from GD)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 09:35 PM
Original message
We Are All the Prolitariat (Dupe from GD)
I suppose the title of this post could be taken to embrace class warfare, which it does, but I would remind any reader that class warfare was declared nearly a quarter century ago with the election of Ronald Reagan. His actions in breaking unions, deregulating business, eliminating the forward-looking energy policies of President Carter, and removing worker's protections clarified Reagan's views on the American middle class. Reagan's dreamy rhetoric failed to match his actions as "Reaganomics" and "trickle-down" were the watchwords of his tenure as President. Then, as now, the American middle class faced social and economic turmoil as American factories closed, large businesses folded, and Reagan's friends and supporters looted both Wall Street and the savings and loans.

Now, the Bush Economic Miracle has taken hold and all workers of every profession now must struggle for survival in an economy that is stacked to favor the corporation over the individual. I've read thread after thread and there is a common theme to most respondents: drastic wage reductions, longer work hours, outsourced departments, long periods of unemployment, and overall, a struggle to maintain current living standards rather than advance. I've read of highly skilled workers who fear asking for a raise, knowing full well that they are beholden to a corporation's ultimate dream circumstance: they feel lucky just to be employed. Myself, in 1998 I was dissatisfied with my job at a government agency and received better than 80% responses on resumes and inquiries. In the current market, I've sent multiple resumes each Sunday and Monday with no response. Even positions that should be a slam dunk given seem out of reach. Needless to say, it is frustrating and frightening to struggle in this environment.

It is certain that Bush's actions have contributed to our plight and I would wager it was intentional on his part. His tax cuts were tangible only to the upper 10% income bracket and strongly favored passive income over wages. His public rationale is this: remove taxes on passive income and these "earnings" will be re-invested to create jobs. Yeah, right. Pardon my cynicism here, but the last thing any of these speculators wish to do in invest in America under these circumstances. Across the world, investors are dropping the dollar, which would herald an American manufacturing boom except for one detail: our manufacturing base is now abroad in China. Far from the apparent expectations of Bush, this passive income is actually remaining in the hands of those who "earned" it. Chief executives who earn over five hundred times a worker's salary, get this, DO NOT return the money to the economy on a broad basis. More likely, these parasites ravage a company's payroll through outsourcing or smart sizing (for those who are business-speak impaired, this means working fewer employees twice as hard)only to receive a huge bonus for lowering operating costs. Now, once it becomes impossible to maintain the company with all the personnel losses, the executive is fired with millions in severance to be hired to repeat the cycle at a new company. Trickle down? No, not really, the money only shifts hands at the top through stock options, various bonuses (severance, performance, etc) and hiring within their own social networks.

In the old days, there was an assumed degree of adversity between those in management and those who were in production or labor. Though some adversity existed between the two, the animosity was largely a product of company propaganda created to divide all workers against another. In labor dichotomy, management is often assumed to be squarely on the side of the corporation. At times, I wager this is true, but I can not see such attitudes surviving in today's economy. These days, no one is immune from the hungry eyes of the corporate hatchet crew. In my experience, be wary if an employer calls in people with such titles as "business consultants" or "efficiency experts" or, as I call them, "The Bobs" from Mike Judge's "Office Space". In both situations where such consultants were utilized, the layoffs were announced within months and affected both workers and management. Again, no one is immune.

Here is the ultimate posit of my argument: if you are on a payroll, you are a prolitariat. I don't care if you manage, if you work, or if you sit in a cubicle: you are a worker. In my own experience, I was considered non-exempt management at a major insurer. This means, in a nutshell, I had all the responsiblities of management without the accompanying pay scale and exemptions in timekeeping. I was then as much a prolitariat as the Kelly Services hourlies who worked for me. I never set myself above them nor did I require anything of them I was unwilling to perfrom myself. In my work experience, management has proven as vulnerable as any other worker to the bean counter's cutbacks. More for less, that's the motto of today's corporations. In fact, an editorial letter written by a local paper company's CFO in the Birmingham News suggested that America needs to extend the work week upwards of fifty hours to compete with China. Great future for us all, eh? Work more for less money and fewer, if any, benefits.

Solidarity. That's the word we need in the workplace. I don't care what your profession; baker, accountant, clerical worker, bricklayer, machinist, whatever. We're all in the same boat if we receive a paycheck and few of us are essential enough to survive a downsize, an outsource, or an importation of H1B's from abroad. Managers, laborers, office workers, everyone needs to keep this in mind every day. We need a true labor movement that will embrace us all and will show those in power we mean business. I am sick of reading about CEO's receiving tens of millions in this current economy. The other day, the CEO of Blockbuster Video received over $51 million after laying off a third of their headquarters workforce. Imagine, if you will, how many jobs that money represented, how much healthcare, how many mortgage or rent payments, that were given to this man for taking away jobs. We need to renew our unions and expand them to include gray and white collar workers. Imagine something postitive: an all inclusive union and a politically active workforce. Imagine shutting down entire cities because of injustices inflicted on a single sector of workers. Imagine this: good health insurance for all workers and their families. Imagine raises and cost of living increases automatically calculated into contract negotiations. We need this now, more than ever, before the American middle class disappears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. short abstract at top, pls.
some friendly advice:

busy folks will never read such a long post.

reach them with an abstract.

In general, the LW writes like a prof with a classroom chained to the chairs for an hour.

the RW knows the avg voter has no time for that. They use short memes and if needed, short to the point arguments. THey edit for brevity.

They win elections.

best wishes. Just some friendly advice, not a slam. You made good points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I appreciate it...
I thought I'd elaborated well, but I received few responses in GD. Labor and economic issues don't seem to attract attention in GD anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What is GD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nadienne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would argue
that RWers (or corporatists, if you prefer) don't just cater to people with short attention spans... They help shorten people's attention spans. They don't want others to spend time thinking about whether or not to buy this or that, or whether or not to vote for him or her.

Memes are short reminders of bigger ideas. The meme in this case might be something like, "We ARE the proletariate." But in order for that to have resonance, the bigger idea, the explanation, etc, has to go first.

The question is, since so many people already have short attention spans, how do we circulate this idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Remember your Marx (He was a brilliant historian)
Marx greatest contribution to Mankind was his connection between history and Economics. Before him economics was look at as a sideline to history, something that occurred while the great men of history made history. Marx showed that a lot of what happened in history was driven by economics, and able to show how and why. He was one of the first to connect revolution with the economic recovery (Revolutions do NOT occur as an economy goes down hill, but as it recovers AFTER A SEVERE DECLINE, for example the French Revolution occurred in 1789, while the Great Famine was in 1787, two years before. By 1789 France was Recovering from the Famine, but that is why you had the French Revolution).

Marx observed that you would NOT have a revolution till the Petty Bourgeoisie is forced by Economic conditions to become members of the Working class.

Now before you go on, most Americans Call themselves "Middle Class" when asked what class their are in. This includes people on Welfare to people who on millions of dollars. If the same people are given the option of "Working Class" about 1/3 of the population calls themselves "Working Class". 10% calls themselves Poor (Generally on Welfare) and 1/3 calls themselves "Upper Middle Class" (Also called the "Professional Class"). Thus leaving about 24% of the population that call themselves "Rich" (It is this group that vote Solidly GOP and the GOP tax cuts for the "Rich" even if the Tax Cuts are going to the top 5% of the population).

Once you understand the US Class Structure you can see what Marx was talking about, i.e. when the "Professional Class" i.e. managers, engineers, and other "Petty" Bourgeoisie are forces to the same earning capacity as the "Working Class" than and only than will you have a revolution. In the 1980s you saw the attack on Working Class income, since the 1990s it has NOT been ONLY Working Class Income under attack, but the Income of the Professional Classes. Thus you are seeing the Professional Classes join the Working Class and once that happens you will have Civil War (i.e. once 2/3 of the Population are united because the Professional Classes no longer have anything to protect from the Working class, both classes will unite and demand a fair share from the "Rich". The "Rich" will try to buy the "poor" to be its foot soldiers against the Working/Professional Class but that will fail for you can NOT deny control of the Country to its Majority once that Majority is united.

Now Marx than would say the Communist should take control of this "Working/Professional Class" but that part of his theory is dead with the old Soviet Union. The issue is who will take over the group and thus change society to better balance the demands of ALL OF ITS CITIZENS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree..
once the Professionals' earnings sink them solidly into Working Class economic straits, then things will begin to happen. I can see it happening as India starts taking jobs that are normally performed here, such as accounting, diagnostic x-ray reviews, IT, programming, coding, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. we are definitely heading toward something
but I am not sure what. The protest of the workers against the Gropinator (Arnie) may be the beginning, or at least I can hope. I am tempted to get a copy of Das Kapital and read it. I think the German site for project Guttenburg may have it.

Hubby & I have joined the working poor. He used to have a good job, and then WorldCom imploded (Bernie Ebbers, may you rot).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Henry George
was referred to by marx as 'capitalism's last stand'.

His seminal works is "Progress and Poverty"
subtitled: An inquiry into the cause of industrial depressions and of the increase of want with increase of wealth / The Remedy

It's available online at http://www.henrygeorge.org/pplink.htm

A handful of nobel laureate economists recommended it as a post soviet economic model to Boris Yeltsin, who was convinced otherwise, in order to receive western economic aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectricIron Sweeney Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Do read Capital
It may seem hard to get through; but Marx was so good about statistics, and anecdotal information that it is a wealth. Today it is good history, as is Lenin's writing on imperialism. Many successful businessmen have started by understanding the economics of capital; but don't believe the bullshit capitalists tell you. Capitalism is a religion, in fact the official religion of this country, and like every system of beliefs, it falls apart when people stop supplying the belief. And, this is no advertisement for state capitalism either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectricIron Sweeney Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. The power of the individual
Just returned from Gettysburg, and Harper ferry. At the latter was a blowup of a handbill comparison between slave and free states from the time, and in every regard the north was beating the south. Slavery was destroying those people and they did not even realize it. In fact, they were willing to fight for it. Lincoln noted years earlier to his friend Speed, that the South was a place for poor white folks to remove from, and not to remove to. Competition with slaves makes all people slaves, and that in a time when taxes on real property made labor dear in all the rest of the country. Today we believe we are the most fortunate, and are willing to kill for the feeling; but the facts will prove, and I expect the future will show that we are allowing capitalism to destroy us and the environment. Our government, and our constitution make all working people slaves. Taxing labor makes property dear and labor cheap. Do not cooperate with the system. Drag your feet and don't sheet yourself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And taxing property makes labor dear
Especially if you exclude property that is the product of labor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC