Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inspecting the Murky Bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 09:06 AM
Original message
Inspecting the Murky Bailout
Unfortunately for taxpayers, we’re still in the dark about our balance sheet. Special Inspector General for TARP, Neil Barofsky, testified to Congress that, Treasury “has repeatedly failed to adopt recommendations that … are essential to providing basic transparency” in TARP. He listed several recommendations ranging from reporting on the valuation of the assets in the TARP portfolio to requiring banks to report how they are actually using funds.

http://taxpayer.net/search_by_category.php?action=view&proj_id=2695&category=Wastebasket&type=Project

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Truth Talks Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. T'ain't murky to me.
The economy is a wreck because of specific problems, like deregulation, privatization, job outsourcing and corporate welfare. The idea that we can spend our way back to fiscal health through some stimulus program - even while we're still outsourcing jobs, handing out corporate bailouts and on and on - is insanity.

Not only will Obama's stimulus program not fix the economy, I don't think it was ever meant to fix anything. In fact, I think it may make things worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Now, now - you sound hopelessly old school. Reagonomics
And Supply Side proved that everything works out great without having any local jobs being created, or laying out even the most minute regulations for banks.

And what could possibly be wrong with offering 11 to 24 Trillion bucks to those banks deemed too big too fail?

It will all work out just fine and dandy.

Unless of course, you aren't in the upper .05 %.

In which case, you should be pulling on those old bootstraps real hard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Shhh
don't tell anybody, but all the money went to Goldman Katz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC