Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CORRECTED: China says one-child policy helps protect climate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:05 AM
Original message
CORRECTED: China says one-child policy helps protect climate
VIENNA (Reuters) - China says its one-child policy has helped the fight against global warming by avoiding 300 million births, the equivalent of the population of the United States.

But delegates at U.N. climate change talks in Vienna said on Thursday birth control is unlikely to find favor as a major policy theme, partly because of opposition by the Catholic Church and some developing nations trying to increase their population.

Some scientists say that birth control measures far less draconian than China's are wrongly overlooked in the fight against climate change, when the world population is projected to soar to about 9 billion by 2050 from 6.6 billion now.

....


The number of births avoided equals the entire population of the United States. Beijing says that fewer people means less demand for energy and lower emissions of heat-trapping gases from burning fossil fuels.

"This is only an illustration of the actions we have taken," said Su Wei, a senior Foreign Ministry official heading China's delegation to the 158-nation talks from Aug 27-31.

He told Reuters that Beijing was not arguing that its policy was a model for others to follow in a global drive to avert ever more chaotic weather patterns, droughts, floods, erosion and rising ocean levels.

But avoiding 300 million births "means we averted 1.3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2005" based on average world per capital emissions of 4.2 tonnes, he said.

...

http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSL3047203920070830?src=083007_1526_DOUBLEFEATURE_va._techs_response&sp=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. It means they don't have to watch their grandchildren starve.
They broke their own hearts so their kids won't. No, a democracy couldn't do it. And they're already finding out that sex selection was a bad idea. But the choice was birth control or death. We'd say, the death would be later so who cares? They actually cared enough to do something about the looming threat of famine.

Since we still have no energy policy and not one of us believes WE will face a nationwide famine, we ain't ones to talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. China has population control ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!!!
The rest of the world needs to immediately follow suit if this planet is to have a chance at curbing its own extinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. one child policy has left ruffly 20 million men
no hope of ever finding a wife. the one child policy is a disaster waiting to happen in the rural areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. What kind of disaster exactly do you have in mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well if we did it here...

...I think a nation of American-raised "only child"s would be pretty disasterous.

But we don't need to. We are only growing due to immigration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The one-child policy didn't do that. Sex selection by parents did that.
You DO know what the historical way of reducing a population of excess males is, BTW? It's called war. They have plenty of cannon fodder now with those single men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC