Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SW Louisianans Feel Shortchanged By Gutted Coastal Restoration Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 09:31 AM
Original message
SW Louisianans Feel Shortchanged By Gutted Coastal Restoration Plan
CAMERON, La. - "For the second night in a row, the state and federal governments' coastal restoration plan faced public scrutiny and a barrage of criticism from residents. Of the 15 major projects included in the plan, none are in Southwest Louisiana, a fact that left those who attended Wednesday night's public meeting discouraged.

The recently downsized $1.9 billion federal-state plan was presented to about 25 local residents, scientists and environmental activists at the Cameron Parish Police Jury building. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers officials faced queries and comments from concerned residents before the presentation ended and long before the officially designated question-and-answer period began. "The biggest focus is on Southeast Louisiana, and to me, there's not enough in Southwest Louisiana," said Rodney Guilbeaux of Constance Beach.

Troy Constance, a manager with the Corps, said the agency was instructed by the Bush administration to select projects that would address only the most pressing coastal problems, and to do so with a limited amount of funding. "We had to make some very tough choices," said Constance, who noted that erosion in the southeast portion of the state is more severe. "This is the beginning of the coastal restoration effort for years to come."

The Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration Plan, originally expected to cost about $14 billion over 30 years, was blocked by the White House, which said the plan should focus on more short-term solutions. The new plan calls for $1.9 billion to be spent over 10 years."

EDIT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some of those Warren Buffett tax cuts could have been used for
this coastal restoration project. It's a shame. I grew up in that area. It used to be clean and beautiful. Last time I was there, which was years ago, it was filthy from tar and oil from the oil rigs and I don't know what all, and there were dead fish all around.

The warning call started being sounded at least in the 1970s, if not earlier. But no one in authority listened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC