Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Surplus Solar Bill Introduced in California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:14 AM
Original message
Surplus Solar Bill Introduced in California
http://www.renewableaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=51505

Californians could soon make money off of their solar systems if a newly introduced bill becomes law. California State Assemblymember Jared Huffman has introduced legislation that would require utilities to pay individuals for any excess solar power produced at a home, government building or business. Currently, the best consumers can get is a "zero" energy bill.

Assembly Bill 1920, which is sponsored by Environment California, was unveiled at the location of California’s largest solar producer, SPG Solar in Novato. AB 1920 will enable consumers who produce solar power to get paid by their utility company for any excess electricity they produce on an annual basis. The level of compensation would be set by the Public Utilities Commission and would help the utility meet their renewable energy goals mandated.

<not much more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. woo hoo!
I would LOVE for this to happen here in MA! It would take away some of the sting of limited solar in the winter months! That's it... i'm calling my congressman again.

I'll kick this AND rec it thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. a good start, albeit lop-sided
people who produce more than they use should be paid market-price month to month, just like the bill they would otherwise receive. Having a commission set the price and paying annually is a rip-off, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC