Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gas costs forcing drivers to cut back - Boston Globe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:55 PM
Original message
Gas costs forcing drivers to cut back - Boston Globe
Source: Boston Globe

Gas costs forcing drivers to cut back
Fuel consumption has declined in US

By Robert Gavin
Globe Staff / February 24, 2008

Gasoline prices have risen so high and stayed high for so long,
that Americans are finally doing what once seemed unthinkable:
driving less.

Inveterate drivers are carpooling, combining errands to eliminate
trips, trying mass transit, and even walking. As a result, gasoline
consumption, which grew steadily in recent years as prices
passed $2, $2.50, and $3 a gallon, has flattened and even
declined, according to the US Energy Department.

Average daily gasoline consumption in the United States has
decreased in each of the past four weeks from a year ago,
according to recent data. In the past six months, average daily
consumption slipped two-tenths of a percent from a year earlier,
after growing 2.5 percent in the previous year.

-snip-

"If a price spike is believed to be temporary, people won't make
these type of changes," Knittel said. "It's the sustained price
levels that are convincing consumers to make long-run decisions
that reduce demand."

-snip-

Read more: http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2008/02/24/gas_costs_forcing_drivers_to_cut_back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. The U.S. is still enjoying
some of the lowest Gas prices in the world. Here, if you do the conversions, Gas is pushing $5 / gallon (and Canada is an oil exporter)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, but we have to drive more.
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 10:03 PM by augie38
I drive 80 miles a day and not able to take public transit. Not many Europeans drive that much to commute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I know alot of people who drive that here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Where is "here" ?
Not in Europe, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. (Judging by the flag)
I'd say "here" is Canada.

(Call me crazy.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Call me dubious
I don't believe there are any laws peculiar to the US that require citizens to commute long distances.

Why can't you:
  • Find a job closer to your home?
  • Find a home closer to your job?
  • Find a new job and home which are closer to each other?
  • Join a "car pool?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I am real
I and each of my siblings have at one time or another commuted 30 or 40 miles for a short time. None of us did it for long. That was by choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:00 PM
Original message
we do not have the social safety nets other countries do
when we get gouged at the pumps we just get gouged
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes and sadly it was Clinton who
got rid of the safety net in the US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. ?
I blame repukes more than I blame Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It was Clinton who passed it all
The Repukes voted for it, but "Workfare" was a Clinton thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. He certainly was glad to take credit for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Your taxes help pay for your health care. You can enjoy that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes, but
It's hard to have sympathy - we have universal health care (which no US candidate is even proposing) because we support it and pay through the nose for it. We also produce alot of oil and gas and pay more for it than the US does. The fact that we have health care does not offset it for most Canadians.

High oil and gas prices (which are going to keep going higher) were inevitable - everyone (including people in the US) has known this was coming for 30 years, but did nothing to prepare for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. We should be so lucky!
I have good health insurance; but I'd gladly pay higher taxes to see universal coverage.

http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2000/en/pr2000-44.html

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
ASSESSES THE WORLD'S HEALTH SYSTEMS



The World Health Organization has carried out the first ever analysis of the world’s health systems. Using five performance indicators to measure health systems in 191 member states, it finds that France provides the best overall health care followed among major countries by Italy, Spain, Oman, Austria and Japan.

The findings are published today, 21 June, in The World Health Report 2000 – Health systems: Improving performance.


The U. S. health system spends a higher portion of its gross domestic product than any other country but ranks 37 out of 191 countries according to its performance, the report finds. The United Kingdom, which spends just six percent of gross domestic product (GDP) on health services, ranks 18th . Several small countries – San Marino, Andorra, Malta and Singapore are rated close behind second-placed Italy.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. must be a slow news day in Boston...this has been happening for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Between Gas And Food Prices
I have noticed a huge reduction in my "free spending" account. I'm surprised more aren't complaining yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. and reducing our driving will just give the oil-Cons
the reason to raise the price more. They are going to get their $$ regardless of what we do.
It's already happened, i read here on DU that January was the first time mileage/driving was down among consumers, yet the prices have still risen. I've also read here on DU that there is a surplus of gasoline so it's not going up in price due to shortage. It's because they can.

Until Congress steps in and taxes those record profits the oil-Cons are raking in, nothing will change, but the price (going up).

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC