4dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 10:29 AM
Original message |
Cellulosic ethanol: not likely to be viable |
|
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/3/3/125745/7746Last fall, a researcher from the USDA -- an agency that has lavished ethanol with research cash since the '70s -- declared that while cellulosic has "some long-term promise" (some?), we shouldn't expect it to contribute significantly to fuel supplies before 2013.
Then in January, Colin Peterson -- chair of the House Ag Committee and a long-time friend of agribiz -- let slip that "I'm not sure cellulosic ethanol will ever get off the ground." He muttered something about "a lot bigger problem to overcome here than people realize in terms of the feedstocks."
Now we get a new study (PDF) from a trio of ag economists at Iowa State University. For the record, the authors are conventional ag scholars firmly entrenched within the corporate-dominated research world described so well by Nancy Scola in her recent "Monsanto U." post.
Indeed, one of the authors holds the Pioneer Hi-Bred International Chair in Agribusiness. (Pioneer is the genetically modified seed arm of the chemical giant Dupont.) The researchers' patrons -- i.e., the agribiz giants -- benefit from the corn-as-bridge-to-cellulosic myth; it keeps those highly profitable government goodies coming.
So it's surprising to see these mainstream economists deliver such a dismal forecast for cellulosic ethanol.
|
TreasonousBastard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
1. A lot of curious assumtions in that report... |
|
and every time I hear an economist talk about "opportunity costs" I get scared.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message |