Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exelon Nuclear reports no damage in today's 5.2 Illinois earthquake

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 12:32 PM
Original message
Exelon Nuclear reports no damage in today's 5.2 Illinois earthquake
Posted : Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:21:08 GMT

WARRENVILLE, Ill., April 18 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- None of Exelon Nuclear's six Illinois nuclear energy stations were affected by early morning seismic activity near the southern Illinois town of West Salem, the company said today.
Plant equipment continued to function normally at each of the six operating nuclear stations. Station operators and technical experts conducted extensive pre-planned inspections when the seismic activity occurred.
Operators performed "walk-downs" to search for potential effects and confirmed by this morning that the earthquake caused no damage to equipment or otherwise affected plant operations. Additional plant walk-downs are scheduled throughout the day. Each plant continued to operate at its normal power level throughout the morning.

Nuclear energy plants are designed specifically to withstand the impact of earthquakes and other severe acts of nature. The quake, reported to be at a magnitude of 5.2 in the Richter Scale, did not challenge the engineered design of any of the six plants. The epicenter was near West Salem, Illinois, about 80 miles east of St. Louis. The closest Exelon Nuclear facility is in Clinton in DeWitt County, about 140 miles north of West Salem.

Exelon operates six Illinois plants in Will, Ogle, DeWitt, Grundy, LaSalle and Rock Island counties. The company owns a non-operating plant in Lake County.
Exelon Corporation is one of the nation's largest electric utilities with approximately $19 billion in annual revenues.

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/exelon-nuclear-reports-no-impact,358240.shtml

Note: The earthquake this morning is near the New Madrid Seismic zone which has seen earthquakes a large as 7.9 in 1812.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Madrid_Seismic_Zone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. the thought that they thought they might be is what worries me
what does a 7.9 quake do for their design. Would any of them be able to handle that without any problems I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. that is what I wonder; how much "quake" can a nuclear power plant withstand?
I'd think someone here would probably know. I'm no expert but knowing that Bechtel uses/used substandard cement in building some of them doesn't set easy with me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, West Salem is on another fault line
Near New Madrid but not a part of that fault system. There have been three earthquakes off this fault that runs through West Salem that I know of--one in '68 and one in '72, as well as this one. Marion IL had damage to buildings in one of the earlier ones, but I forget which one. Towns on the New Madrid fault weren't effected. There doesn't appear to be a connection between the two as far as predicting earthquakes.

That being said, we're due for another big one on the New Madrid around 2012. Geological evidence shows they come about every 200 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. thanks for the info
I was wondering about the relation to New Madrid this particular quake might have had. Somebody wondered aloud if all the flooding had anything to do with this quake? Dunno!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC