Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bottled Water Costs 141X As Much As Tap, But Half Of Those Taste-Tested Couldn't Tell Them Apart

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 12:56 PM
Original message
Bottled Water Costs 141X As Much As Tap, But Half Of Those Taste-Tested Couldn't Tell Them Apart
NO MAJOR sporting event goes by without close-up shots of competitors throwing their heads back and quenching their thirst with prominently displayed bottles of water from some remote fiord or spring. But a survey released today by the watchdog magazine Which? reveals half of consumers cannot taste the difference between bottled and tap water. And 18 per cent of the 3,039 people who took part in a blind-tasting preferred the flavour of tapwater.

But there are signs that the cost of bottled water is turning buyers off. Consumers in the UK spent £1.68 billion buying 2.275 billion litres of bottled water in 2006. The best-selling mineral water, Evian, will set you back some 31p a litre, while tap water costs an average of 0.22p a litre – 141 times cheaper.

Nearly a quarter of those surveyed by Which? said they were drinking less bottled water than they did a year ago, while separate research in April, by the retail analyst TNS, found sales were down 9 per cent last year.

Neil Fowler, the editor of Which?, said: "There are plenty of good reasons for choosing tap water. You can save money, it's better for the environment and it can taste just as good – if not better. "The UK has some of the safest and best-quality drinking water in the world. It's time we started appreciating it." According to Which?, the bottled-water production process wastes an estimated two gallons of water for every gallon purified to put into a bottle.

EDIT

http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/It39s-141-times-dearer-than.4319073.jp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. My tap water is awful
but I use a Britta filter. Unlike the morons upstairs who buy cases of bottled water for indoor use. I hate them so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I can't say I hate them, but I do hate the foolishness
of paying for something they can get out of a tap and run through a filter.

I'll be glad when the silly designer water fad dies.

FWIW, the few times I've been on the run and thirsty and bought a bottle of water, it's been the ultra filtered tap water. Turns out in blind tasting, it always wins over the pricey foreign stuff.

This will always be looked back on as a mind bogglingly silly age. Bottled water will probably tie with the current administration as proof we collectively took leave of our senses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Same here. Supposedly LA's water is the best city water in taste tests,
but I can't stand the chlorine taste, and I hate finding the clumps of white stuff when my ice cubes melt. I use Britta filtration for all my consumption/cooking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. New York City always scores well
but that's because they get all of their water from us in upstate.
http://www.observer.com/2008/good-news-about-new-york-citys-water

However, after talking to some researchers, I distrust fluoridation.
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11571
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've only lived in one area where the water was undrinkable
Oakhurst, California.

Even though I know people who swear up and down that the EPA standards for Uranium in water are very conservative, and drinking water that has three times the allowable amount won't hurt you, I don't care to take my chances. :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC