Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Christie Todd Whitman: McCain's grand vision is a "nice idea" but it's "not going to happen"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:59 PM
Original message
Christie Todd Whitman: McCain's grand vision is a "nice idea" but it's "not going to happen"
Edited on Wed Aug-06-08 04:59 PM by bananas
Forbes talks to some nuclear lobbyists:

"NEI lobbyist Richard Myers said a new, two-unit nuclear power plant could cost as much as $14 billion.
By comparison, the entire market capitalization of many companies in the industry is barely double this, or smaller."

"Whitman says McCain's grand vision is a "nice idea" but it's "not going to happen""

"NEI has spent $1.23 million on lobbying so far in 2008."


For some reason, they never mention the Congressional Budget Office analysis that the risk of default on the new plants is "very high - well above 50 percent".


http://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/nuclear-congress-energy-biz-beltway-cx_jz_bw_0806nuclear.html

Nukes Need Money

<snip>

Whitman's got a vested interest in seeing the U.S. nuclear industry bloom. She spoke to Forbes.com in her role as co-chair of the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition, a pro-nuclear group whose very broad membership includes nuclear power heavyweights like Exelon (nyse: EXC - news - people ), AREVA (other-otc: ARVCF.PK - news - people ) and Southern Co.. It's funded by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), an industry organization.

<snip>

Speaking at a nuclear energy conference at the Center for Strategic and International Studies last week, NEI lobbyist Richard Myers said a new, two-unit nuclear power plant could cost as much as $14 billion. By comparison, the entire market capitalization of many companies in the industry is barely double this, or smaller. Southern, FPL Group (nyse: FPL - news - people ), Dominion Resources (nyse: D - news - people ), Duke Energy (nyse: DUK - news - people ) and Entergy (nyse: ETR - news - people ) have capitalizations in the $20 billion to $30 billion range. Of major firms in the industry, only Exelon is significantly bigger, at about $49 billion. A nuclear renaissance could run upwards of $200 billion in construction costs alone.

This makes financing a plant extremely difficult, and it is why investment bankers like John Gilbertson at Goldman Sachs and John Matthews at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius believe that a loan guarantee program from the federal government is of crucial importance.

<snip>

Moreover, Whitman says McCain's grand vision is a "nice idea" but it's "not going to happen," partly because one reactor component is only built in Japan.

Still, the industry's staying busy. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, a watchdog group, the NEI has spent $1.23 million on lobbying so far in 2008. In June, the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition released a study touting the job creation a nuclear renaissance could bring--as many as 700 jobs at each reactor, many of which pay upwards of $65,000 per year.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Makes me wonder how much he's getting in 'donations' from the industry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Christie Todd Whitman is another one who should be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. So we'd spend as much on a single reactor as themost ambitious alt energy plan
NICE!!!!! :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. $14 B for two units...

how many gigawatt hours?

how much to operate on an annual basis?

14 B would be enough to buy and install 1.6 Million small wind turbines, each of which is capable of 5Kw of production (you have to know where they would be installed to understand the total expected kwH over the course of a year). Operating costs for rural installed wind turbines, one for each small farmer in the United States, would be significantly less than the operating costs of two nukes. Much better would be to make $14B available as 0 interest loans to farmers to be used for small wind generators, less loss in transmission lines, no dependence on uranium, not as much green house gas produced in the mining of uranium (both projects would use significant amounts of oil to mine ore for the steel and to transport items to work sites, etc). However, such a distributed wind energy plan will be less environmentally destructive AND have the advantage of being highly distributed and much less prone to failures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I like the idea of spending it on solar manufacturing facilities.
Nanosolar is producing a 1.65 million dollar machine capable of putting out 1 GW worth of panels per year w/14% capacity factor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck her. she has 9/11 blood on her hands.
she needs to rot in hell on a spit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC