Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Massive solar project garners protests from solar energy industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:19 PM
Original message
Massive solar project garners protests from solar energy industry
http://www.edn.com/blog/1470000147/post/960031696.html
Thursday, August 14, 2008

Massive solar project garners protests from solar energy industry

Aug 14 2008 11:24AM

Southern California Edison came up with an economical and scalable plan to encourage solar energy use and also delay building conventional energy generating plants in Southern California: Install solar panels on the acres of industrial rooftops in LA and use these as supplemental energy sources during daytime peak energy demand. Here are the specs: The project that will place 250 megawatts of advanced photovoltaic generating technology on 65 million square feet of roofs of Southern California commercial buildings – enough power to serve approximately 162,000 homes. It will be the nation’s largest solar cell installation.

What’s not to like with this plan? It doesn’t require environmental impact reports or installation of a new power transmission infrastructure, and with some retrofitting and strengthening, can be done over existing structures.

Not so fast, say a group of solar companies, industry trade groups and others who argue it would give Edison too much of a monopoly on California's solar market.



"Recurrent Energy believes ratepayers, property owners, California residents, the solar industry and its employees are best served by an open, competitive marketplace for the development of distributed solar-generating projects," Harris said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems to me there'd be enough demand for solar power to satisfy everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. And how much land will this massive complex take up?
I think people are missing the point. Shouldn't the focus be on removing the need for more environmentally damaging projects? Sure, it's better than burning coal, oil, or nuclear, but it's not better than NOTHING...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. None, nada, zilch
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 04:40 PM by OKIsItJustMe
… 65 million square feet of roofs of Southern California commercial buildings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. None
it says on the roofs of existing industrial buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Damn you. Damn you all. Stop ruining my negativity...
:P Ohh ok, well how about this? They could have planted gardens on those roofs instead... ;)


Yeah, I dunno... I just hate making things easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Any idea how much dirt weighs?
(They probably couldn't plant gardens on many of them.) ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Then why don't the other companies set up a plan
to rent solar systems to homeowners? I say rent because homeowners aren't going to want to do the maintenance and that could be the companies responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deregulation of electricity is the answer!
I could swear I've heard that before. It's on the tip of my tongue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. The fucking GREED in the country is driving me INSANE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC