Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nature - Urban Heat Island Effect Debunked

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 10:00 AM
Original message
Nature - Urban Heat Island Effect Debunked
"A major argument used by sceptics of global warming is flawed, a UK Met Office study in Nature magazine says. This argument maintains that much recorded climate data is inherently unreliable because of where weather instruments are situated.

Most are in or near cities, which produce their own heat; so the rapid warming measured over the last century could be just a record of urbanisation. The Met Office believes its study shows this "urban heat island" idea is wrong.

The analysis has been done by Dr David Parker. He used data for the last 50 years to create two separate graphs. One plots temperatures observed on calm nights, the other on windy nights. If the urban heat island hypothesis is correct, he says, instruments should have recorded a bigger temperature rise for calm nights than for windy ones - because wind blows excess heat away from cities and away from the measuring instruments. But there is no difference between the curves. "It helps to answer the critics," Dr Parker told BBC News.

"There are other kinds of temperature measurements, too, which could not be influenced by urbanisation, such as warming in the oceans. "Different methods of measurement can produce different rates of warming but they all point upwards." Myles Allen, from the atmospheric physics department at Oxford University, agrees: "It's pretty convincing," he said. "It's a sensible analysis which tests a prediction of the sceptical theory; and if it's right, we should see a greater effect on calm nights. "But you should never overestimate the ingenuity of the sceptics to come up with a counter-argument."

EDIT

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4021197.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's Great
I had heard the urban heat island explanation before, and it seemed like an interesting hypothesis to explain some of the results. Unfortunately, it was seized on as a way to discredit all gobal warming data. These red herrings are used as a way to forestall action indefinitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. i live on the outskirts of Phoenix (or it was the outskirts 8 years ago)
and on summer nights after midnight we could pass a certain street where the urban density started to thin out and feel an immediate 10 degree temp drop in the convertible car

urban heat sinks aren't a "theory" here.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think the article (which I haven't read yet)
is debunking the idea of the heat island itself. Heat islands definitely exist at the local scale. Rather, I think the article is debunking the argument that heat island effects have a strong enough impact on the overall instrumental record to be responsible for the observed global-scale warming trend...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC