Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ford Promises 30% Better Mileage Using Ethanol Injection

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:34 PM
Original message
Ford Promises 30% Better Mileage Using Ethanol Injection
Ford says the next generation of their Ecoboost engine technology, codenamed Bobcat, will provide 30% more fuel efficiency than a traditional gasoline combustion engine by directly injecting ethanol into the gas/air mixture prior to detonation.

Although Ford’s first generation Ecoboost engines start hitting the market next year — promising a 20% gain in fuel economy over traditional engines — Ford is already tweaking their new Bobcat technology to squeeze out even more fuel efficiency from the direct ethanol injection system.

The technology works by merging a turbocharger with a high compression ratio in the same engine. Combining these two features normally results in an incompatible and disastrous mix which causes premature detonation of the fuel/air mixture — referred to as engine knock.

Ford gets around this incompatibility by injecting a small amount of ethanol into the gas/air mixture before detonation in the combustion chamber. Purportedly, the addition of the ethanol cools the mixture enough that it doesn’t ignite until the engine tells it to, thus preventing the dreaded knock.

http://gas2.org/2008/09/03/ford-promises-30-better-mileage-using-ethanol-injection/


Smaller engine, less weight, better mileage, same or better performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. (a) suuuuure. (b) too little, too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Past time Ford did something like this.
Probably too little, too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. not a bad idea for commercial vehicles
because it would be cheaper than diesel fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. I prefer hydrogen combustion engines
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 12:35 AM by SurferBoy
because hydrogen can be cheaply made through the electrolysis of ocean water. You know, that blue stuff that covers 2/3 of the Earth.

Normally, electrolysis takes some time with pure water, but is greatly sped up with the introduction of an electrolyte, like salt. Gee, think ocean water contains salt?

What else besides hydrogen is produced by electrolysis? Oxygen. You know, that gas that all animal life needs to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not at all cheap. Cheapest source of hydrogen is actually fossil fuels.
Not advocating just saying.

Most hydrogen is made by catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons.

Or sometimes the water gas method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hydrogen is difficult to move and store though.
If your going to make hydrogen, you may as well just use it and biomass as a feedstock for a fischer-tropsch process to create a hydrocarbon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's supposed to be an option on the next...
version of the Lincoln MKS, due out later this year or early next year. This won't be cheap, but it will give you 5+ liter V-8 power in a 3.5 liter V-6 with no turbo lag and no increase (possibly even a reduction) in fuel costs. It goes into the Focus when the cost goes down and it should bring the mileage up to well over 40mpg. The Mercury Milan is already a very nice car-- stick a four with this gadgetry in it and it should beat the crap out of anything else out there.

While the peanut gallery is enamored of Toyota (which sells far more more SUVs than Priuses, btw) Ford has quietly been tweaking existing technology for steady mileage gains, while sticking the toe in the water with neat things like the Escape hybrid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC