Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two Years Ago, Scientists Didn't See Major Arctic Ice Loss Before 2050, However .. . . Guardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:35 PM
Original message
Two Years Ago, Scientists Didn't See Major Arctic Ice Loss Before 2050, However .. . . Guardian
year will see the second-biggest loss on record of Arctic sea ice - a sign that the area of ice coverage is shrinking at a pace faster than once expected. The trend also suggests that global warming is likely to increase, polar bear habitat will decline, and previously icebound areas could be opened to oil and gas exploration.

Mark Serreze, a senior scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Centre, said yesterday that the sea-ice minimum, which will be reached later this month, won't hit last year's record because the amount of daylight is decreasing in the Arctic and a new freeze is beginning.

But the minimum amount of ice at summer's end this year will be near last year's total. In 2007, the extent of Arctic ice was 23% lower than the previous record in 2005. That 2007 total, which set a record, was 1.65m square miles. As of Monday, satellite observations showed 1.78m square miles.

EDIT

The centre's measurements show the ice has declined dramatically during the past 30 years. "The real issue is, what's the long-term trend - and it's negative," Serreze said. He said summer could be ice-free in the Arctic by 2030. Some scientists give it just another decade. Two years of extreme ice minimums indicate that the low in 2007 wasn't random, said James Overland, a scientist who researches the Arctic climate at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The cause of the ice loss is a combination of global warming from an increase of greenhouse gases and natural variations - winds that brought warm temperatures and blew ice to the Atlantic side, Overland said. If the cause was global warming alone, most scientists thought they wouldn't see this kind of ice loss for 30 years, he said.

EDIT

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/10/poles.climatechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some scientists give it just another decade?
Hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, how fast do you expect it to happen?
:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think a decade sounds optimistic
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC