Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State Of Alaska Redefines "Frost" To Extend Oil Exploration Season

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:29 AM
Original message
State Of Alaska Redefines "Frost" To Extend Oil Exploration Season
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - "Snow is more important than ice in protecting the delicate tundra from disturbances, a finding that holds promise for a longer oil-exploration season in Alaska's rapidly warming Arctic, state officials said on Friday.

Officials from the state Department of Natural Resources, who released the conclusions of a study they conducted into the impact of heavy equipment on the North Slope tundra, said the finding supports a policy change that will help open the region to exploration earlier in the winter. "The results are we're going to be able to start every exploration season sooner now than we would have under the old rules, with absolutely no impact to the environment," Tom Irwin, commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, said at a news conference held by Gov. Frank Murkowski. The study, funded by the US Department of Energy, was prompted by a warming trend that has drastically shortened the time available for exploration, from more than 200 days a year in the 1970s to about half that now.

EDIT

Technically, the department will still require oil explorers to wait until there is at least six inches of snow on the surface and 12 inches of frost below it before equipment may be driven over the tundra, Loeffler said. But now the definition of "frost" will vary, depending on how easily the ground is penetrated by a testing device."

EDIT

Kelly Scanlon Hill, Arctic coordinator for the Northern Alaska Environmental Center, said the conclusions were premature because the study was too short in duration and lacked peer review. "Impacts on the tundra might take up to two to three years to be noticed because of the ecology," she said. (Ed. - emphasis added)

http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/28436/story.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC