Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GM Regulatory Filing - Volt "Not Yet Proven To Be Commercially Viable" - Autocar.co.uk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:28 PM
Original message
GM Regulatory Filing - Volt "Not Yet Proven To Be Commercially Viable" - Autocar.co.uk
EDIT

General Motors has cast doubt over the long-term future of the Chevrolet Volt by claiming it may not be commercially viable and other rivals may overtake it with superior and more advanced technology. GM submitted a regulatory filing report to the US Treasury yesterday and CEO Fritz Henderson claimed its “disclosures are consistent with our commitment to remain transparent and to keep the public informed of our progress”.

The Volt is scheduled for a November 2010 launch, but the GM report claimed that the range-extender hybrid technology may not be fully developed in time to meet this target date. Pre-production Volt models began testing in June. GM has marketed the Volt as the model to turn the company around, but the report claimed it “has not yet proven to be commercially viable”. GM is likely to sell each Volt at a large loss, although it would hope to recoup the development costs in future-generation models as Toyota has done with its Prius.

GM, which is majority-owned by the US Treasury, has based its entire business plan around securing US Department for Energy loans to help it develop advanced fuel technology vehicles. So far, despite three applications for a $5.7 billion (£3.4bn) share of the $25bn (£15bn) fund, GM has not been accepted and is due to make a fourth application this month.

“There can be no assurance that we will qualify for any remaining loans or receive any such loans even if we qualify,” said the GM report. It added that the US Treasury “is able to exercise significant influence and control over our business if it elects to do so”, but so far this has not been the case. GM is also fearful that wealthier competitors will come up with similar technology to the Volt and it will be left behind. “Our competitors and others are pursuing similar technologies and other competing technologies, in some cases with more money available,” said GM.

EDIT

http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.ASpx?AR=242395
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. wonder who got pissed off over their 230 mpg claim? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That makes no sense at all
How long do you suppose it takes to prepare a filing like that? (I mean, do you think they do it overnight?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds pretty standard stuff for bizplan filing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're probably right - normal due diligence and all that . .
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. That certainly seems reasonable
I dunno:
  • Will people pay $40K± for the "Volt?"
  • Will there be a government "incentive?"


How can it be proven to be "commercially viable" before they try to sell it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. WTF is your problem?
Why are you misrepresenting information in an attempt to attack this technology?

EVERY forward looking pronouncement by a company is couched in this type of precautionary language. Failure to use such language is a sucker's bet inviting lawsuits on any planned action that fails.

In other words, no matter how low the chances of failure are considered by the company, they will still use exactly the same conditional phrasing in official investor related literature.

In even other words, THERE IS NO LOWER LIMIT ON THE RISK EVALUATION that would cause a responsible company to NOT use such language.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. EEEEEEE! OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO!!!! EEEEEE!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. zomg
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Is hatrack the author of the Autocar news story?
Christ, he didn't even add any of his own comments to the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. You are quite correct
The filing was an SEC filing, and the disclosures were made under the "Risk Factors" section, which is typically a CYA.

A minor point is that the filing specifies the battery technology “has not yet proven to be commercially viable”, not the car itself.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1467858/000119312509169233/d8k.htm#toc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who killed the Volt?
...coming to a theater near you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Shhhh, stop bringing reality to the table, okay???
aside from the 230 mpg claim they are also promising an cappuccino maker and a pony!

The pony is for when the volt vanishes from the market and the capp maker is to have something to drink while riding your pony! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC