Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

guardian.co.uk: (UK) Emissions reductions are misleading, says government's new science adviser

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 10:03 AM
Original message
guardian.co.uk: (UK) Emissions reductions are misleading, says government's new science adviser
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/oct/01/carbon-emissions-david-mackay

Emissions reductions are misleading, says government's new science adviser

UK's true energy footprint is twice as big as on paper, according to Professor David MacKay

David Adam, environment correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 1 October 2009 13.28 BST

Britain's reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases are misleading, according to the government's new chief scientist.

Professor David MacKay told the BBC that greenhouse gas emissions created by Britons are probably twice as bad as official figures suggest. The figures are distorted because developing countries now made the goods that Britain buys, he said.

"Our energy footprint has decreased over the last few decades and that's largely because we've exported our industry," MacKay said. "Other countries make stuff for us so we have naughty, naughty China and India out of control with rising emissions but it's because they are making our stuff for us now."

MacKay, a Cambridge University physicist who starts his new job at the Department of Energy and Climate Change(Decc) today, was speaking unofficially in a previously recorded interview. His comments come as talks on a global climate deal continue in Bangkok. The issue of allocating emissions has been highlighted by developing countries including China, whose top climate change negotiator Li Gao earlier this year said developed countries should take responsibility for the emissions generated in making goods.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow ... that was a refreshing dose of honesty!
You can tell he's the new guy can't you?

He'll soon bow down to "political expediency" or be replaced by
another bought-out twat from the Sainsbury mould ...

Still, maybe he can make some real progress in the meantime with
that attitude.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC