Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exclusive: Brochure may reveal Gore accurately cited scientist's prediction of ice-free Arctic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:52 AM
Original message
Exclusive: Brochure may reveal Gore accurately cited scientist's prediction of ice-free Arctic
Exclusive: Brochure may reveal Gore accurately cited scientist's prediction of ice-free Arctic -- It is the Scientist who has the explaining to do -- not Gore

Climate Depot Exclusive

Tuesday, December 15, 2009By Marc Morano – Climate Depot

COPENHAGEN - Al Gore's citation of a scientist predicting an ice-free Arctic within a decade appears to have been accurate. It appears the scientist Gore cited, Dr. Wieslav Maslowski, did in fact make this prediction and it was http://freshnor.dmi.dk/handout_freshnor.pdf">published on December 2, 2009 by the Danish Climate Centre, lending support to Gore's claim that the “figures are fresh.”

On December 14, former Vice President Al Gore told the UN climate summit that the Arctic could be ice free within a decade. “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to http://research.nps.navy.mil/cgi-bin/vita.cgi?p=display_vita&id=1023568034">Dr (Wieslav) Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years,” Gore said.

But Dr. Maslowski essentially threw Gore under the bus, according to a December 15, 2009 article in the UK Times:

“However, the climatologist whose work Mr. Gore was relying upon dropped the former Vice-President in the water with an icy blast. 'It's unclear to me how this figure was arrived at,” Dr. Maslowski said. 'I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.' Mr. Gore's office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr. Maslowski as a 'ballpark figure' several years ago in a conversation with Mr. Gore.” The UK Times characterized it as Gore's "embarrassing error."

But Climate Depot has obtained a handout on the Arctic that is being distributed by the Danish government that cites Dr. Maslowski's Arctic modeling and it appears to vindicate Gore's citation of Dr. Maslowski. The December 2, 2009 handout, published by the Danish Climate Centre is entitled “http://freshnor.dmi.dk/handout_freshnor.pdf">FreshNor The freshwater budget of the Nordic Seas.

Continues: http://www.climatedepot.com/a/4483/Exclusive-Brochure-reveals-Gore-accurately-cited-scientists-prediction-of-icefree-Arctic%E2%80%94It-is-the-Scientist-who-has-the-explaining-to-do%E2%80%94not-Gore


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Al Gore should have been our President!
What a pity he wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Brochure not written by Scientist
That Brochure cites technical data. But the specific conclusions which can be read from it don't state an Iceless arctic. In fact it states a as yet unknown minimum level of Ice will remain for an extended period.

Not surprising then that the scientist would throw him under the bus as it looks as though he may have been misquoted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "nearly ice-free" vs. "completely free of ice"
yeah, I can see how Maslowski might have been slightly annoyed at being misquoted, but c'mon.

Talk about missing the forest for a single really small tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. He wasn't misquoted
here is the transcript of an interview in 2008. You can listen for yourself:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x222118#222137

Dr Wieslaw Maslowski predicted a 2013 Ice Free Summer Arctic five years ago - now he says that may have been too conservative
Posted on 24 Mar 2008


We speak to Wieslaw Maslowski about his prediction that by the summer of 2013, we will have completely lost ice cover in the Arctic. Dr. Maslowski says that the complete loss of summer ice may actually happen sooner. The concern we have at Beyond Zero Emissions is that without moving to near zero emissions and drawing down atmospheric carbon as soon as possible, this could cause the irreversible melt of Greenland leading to 5 metre sea level rises this century...


Matthew Wright: Ok. So now, it was reported in The New York Times that you said that 2013 was a possibility, and perhaps you'd actually projected this some years ago, that we could lose the summer sea ice extent - that's in the summer solstice is it?

Dr Wieslaw Maslowski: That is correct. So the minimum in the Arctic ice extent has been typically occurring some time in September, between early September and late September every summer. So, the minimum of ice extent is simply defined as the ice edge of percentage roughly say between 15, maybe at 20%, ice cover. And then everything inside this ice edge position on the Atlantic side and on the Pacific side is considered to be the ice extent so it's not really concentration - it's just the area within the 15% or 20% ice concentration or more. And this ice minimum has been declining quite significantly. The global climate models have predicted, and your audience is probably familiar with this International Panel for Climate Change study, Annual Report IV that has been published and presented quite extensively this year, earlier this year in 2007, and actually the panel together with 'president' Al Gore have won the Nobel Prize nomination, so those studies from this panel, the multi-national climate simulation study have predicted the ice might be disappearing in summer, the northern summer in the Arctic, maybe sometime by the end of this 21st century.

There are some model simulations, single model simulations, that are suggesting that it could possibly occur as early as 2050 or maybe even as early as 2030. Comparing those models simulations predictions with the satellite observations of the Arctic sea ice extent actually shows that most of those models are too conservative predicting the current and the past ice extent changes in the Arctic as has been observed. So the idea is that the climate models - they're underestimating, they are too conservative in their prediction.

What our contribution, our study contribution to this overall topic is that we're saying that the satellite are only observing the 2-dimensional changes in the sea ice in the Arctic in terms of this ice extent. However, we do not have the observations of ice thickness - the third dimension, the vertical dimension - are very limited of the Arctic sea ice. And having those models that we used, we are able to look at the changes associated, not only with the ice extent, but also ice thickness and this way we can eventually calculate and try to understand the changes in the total ice volume in the Arctic. And our studies are suggesting that actually the volume and the thickness is decreasing even faster than the aerial observations from satellites. And this way we're saying that actually if we already have lost probably about 40% volume in the Arctic so far, if we project this trend ongoing for the last 10 - 15 years, we probably will reach zero in summer some time mid next century, mid next decade, I'm sorry.


Original at:
http://beyondzeroemissions.org/media/radio/dr-wieslaw-maslowski-predicted-2013-ice-free-summer-arctic-five-years-ago-now-he-says-ma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Quelle surprise!
As I said in the other thread posting the article that accused Gore of "lying," this whole brouhaha is picking nits and calling them elephants.

The science is sound. One number, even if old and incorrectly given, doesn't change a damn thing.

Let's keep our eye on the ball:

(1) Human activity pollutes -- in a big way.

(2) Pollution contributes to/causes global climate change.

(3) Global climate change has reached a tipping point in terms of the planet's* capacity to sustain life.

(4) We'd better fucking do something about it.

(5) The rest is all stupid quibbling.


* The single planet that is our only home.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. How about a cite for #3
I have heard no credible scientist present this.

Even the most dire predictions of 4-5 degree rise will not threaten life on earth, only a fraction of it at low elevation and living where deserts might appear. Which might be offset by habitable areas farther north and increased vegetation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No problem.
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 03:27 AM by silverweb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. You forgot #6
(6) Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC