Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"IEA wants brakes on fuel consumption"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 09:19 PM
Original message
"IEA wants brakes on fuel consumption"
IEA wants brakes on fuel consumption

By Adam Porter in Perpignan, France

Thursday 24 March 2005, 18:09 Makka Time, 15:09 GMT  


Vehicular fuel accounts for a big chunk of global oil consumption


The International Energy Agency (IEA) is to propose drastic cutbacks in car use to halt continuing oil-supply problems. Those cutbacks include anything from car-pooling to outright police-enforced driving bans for citizens.

Fuel "emergency supply disruptions and price shocks" - in other words, shortages - could be met by governments. Not only can governments save fuel by implementing some of the measures suggested, but in doing so they can also shortcut market economics.

An advance briefing of the report, titled Saving Oil in a Hurry: Measures for Rapid Demand Restraint in Transport, states this succinctly.
 
"Why should governments intervene to cut oil demand during a supply disruption or price surge? One obvious reason is to conserve fuel that might be in short supply.

"But perhaps more importantly, a rapid demand response can send a strong market signal."


http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/655B03B0-32C2-4BF7-A3E8-F7EFD8144333.htm

----


Sorry if this has been posted before - this is the second time today that I've heard someone talking about ways to ration oil. The other was in the context of global warming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now why would they want to do that?
Didn't Crown Prince Abdullah just promise to nearly double Saudi output in less than ten years? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another way would be to start increasing fuel tax.
Use the revenue to fund a migration to non-fossil energy sources, or public transportation projects.

This would have worked a lot better if we'd started it 30 years ago, but everybody was too busy laughing at Carter's sweater and solar panels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. (nevermind)
Edited on Tue Apr-26-05 12:10 PM by bloom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC