Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Small family farms in tropics can feed the hungry and preserve biodiversity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 09:50 PM
Original message
Small family farms in tropics can feed the hungry and preserve biodiversity
http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7536
Feb. 22, 2010

Small family farms in tropics can feed the hungry and preserve biodiversity

ANN ARBOR, Mich.—Conventional wisdom among many ecologists is that industrial-scale agriculture is the best way to produce lots of food while preserving biodiversity in the world's remaining tropical forests. But two University of Michigan researchers reject that idea and argue that small, family-owned farms may provide a better way to meet both goals.

In many tropical zones around the world, small family farms can match or exceed the productivity of industrial-scale operations, according to U-M researchers Ivette Perfecto and John Vandermeer. At the same time, smaller diversified farms are more likely to help preserve biodiversity in tropical regions undergoing massive amounts of deforestation, Perfecto and Vandermeer conclude in a paper to be published online Feb. 22 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

"Most of the tropical forest that's left is fragmented, and what you have are patches of forest surrounded by agriculture," said Perfecto, a professor at the School of Natural Resources and Environment. "If you want to maintain biodiversity in those patches of forest, then the key is to allow organisms to migrate between the patches.

"And small-scale family farms that adopt sustainable agricultural technologies are more likely to favor migration of species than a huge, monocultural plantation of soybeans or sugar cane or some other crop."

Some ecologists have suggested that the history of eastern North American forests provides a preview of what's likely to happen in the tropics. European colonization of eastern North America led to massive deforestation that accompanied the expansion of agriculture. Later, industrialization drew people to cities from the rural areas, and the forests recovered.

This scenario is known as the forest transition model. It has been argued that if a similar progression occurs in the tropics, then the decline in rural populations would make more land potentially available for conservation. A corollary of the forest transition model states that if you consolidate agriculture into large, high-tech farms, productivity increases and more land is freed up for conservation.

But after reviewing case studies from Costa Rica, El Salvador, Panama, Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, Perfecto and Vandermeer conclude "there is little to suggest that the forest transition model is useful for the tropics" and that it "projects an overly optimistic vision."

Instead, the U-M researchers propose an alternative model, which they call the matrix quality model. They say it provides a solid foundation for conservation planning in tropical regions.

If you think of the fragments of remaining tropical forest as islands in an ocean of agriculture, the ocean is what Perfecto and Vandermeer call the matrix—it's the area between the patches of undisturbed natural habitat.

A high-quality matrix is one that enables plants and animals to migrate between the remaining patches of forest, increasing the likelihood that a given species will be able to survive, helping to preserve biodiversity.

Small, family-owned farms that use agroecological techniques come closest to mimicking natural forest habitat, thereby creating corridors that allow plants and animals to migrate between forest fragments. Agroecological techniques can include the use of biological controls instead of pesticides, the use of compost or other organic matter instead of chemical fertilizers, and the use of agroforestry methods, which involve growing crops beneath a canopy of trees or growing crops mixed with fruit trees such as mangoes or avocados.

"If you're really interested in conserving species, you should not just concentrate on preserving the fragments of natural habitat that remain, even though that's where many species are," said Vandermeer, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and a professor at the School of Natural Resources and Environment. "You also need to concentrate on the areas between the fragments, because those are the places that species have to migrate through."

Vandermeer said he advocates the break-up of large-scale farms in the tropics, as well as incentives to encourage "a large number of small-scale farmers, each managing the land to the best of his or her ability, using agroecological techniques."

Perfecto said these goals are in line with the findings of the 2009 International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development synthesis report. The report concluded that small-scale, sustainable farms are the best way to alleviate world hunger while promoting sustainable development. Perfecto was one of the report's authors.

The PNAS article by Perfecto and Vandermeer is part of a special report in the journal about solutions to the world food crisis. Perfecto, Vandermeer and Angus Wright discuss the links between agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty in their book "Nature's Matrix," published last year by Earthscan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know anecdotes aren't data
but my friend was telling me yesterday about birding in Colombia, and how a lot of the small farmers there LOVE the wildlife and the forests and are eager to preserve these areas on their own land.

Big ag has no connection to the land, and if a riparian area breeds birds that eat the crops, the riparian area will be destroyed without another thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My Grandfather was a family farmer
He was well in tune with his land (cultivated and not) and the animals (domesticated and wild.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. While attending college with a young Nigerian I read a history book
of his country that he had with him. They had small family farms that did feed their families until they were lured into the city to work in the international corporations factories. The land was taken over by large corporate farms to grow things like peanuts to export to other countries and that is when REAL hunger started for that nation. Many who moved to the city did not even have work. Whole families were unable to feed themselves.

So now these MI prof. want to depopulate the rural areas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think you may be misreading
...

In many tropical zones around the world, small family farms can match or exceed the productivity of industrial-scale operations, according to U-M researchers Ivette Perfecto and John Vandermeer. At the same time, smaller diversified farms are more likely to help preserve biodiversity in tropical regions undergoing massive amounts of deforestation, Perfecto and Vandermeer conclude in a paper to be published online Feb. 22 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I did understand that part. Just wanted to include what happened
to Nigeria. Also the part I was referring to was when it was talking about the deforestation of North America and the move to the cities. That is a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I believe you're in agreement with the authors
They too think that deforestation is a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUpWithIt All Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think they mean that reforestation would occur in the areas remaining if
corporations were replaced by the smaller family farms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
7.  A report on American Farms from the 1950s is similar
Basically, if you look at production per acre as opposed to production of a SINGLE crop per acre, small farms are more efficient. The main reason is that such farms plant more then one crop per field. In the United States the Native Americans (And most white farmers after them) would plant the "Three Sisters" in the same field. The Three Sisters are Corn, Beans and Pumpkins. Corn need the extra Nitrogen fixed by the Bean, the Bean plant crawl up the corn plant while the pumpkin covers the floor. This combination required MANUAL weeding and harvesting, but doable enough to feed a family AND produce excess for market.

The chief problem with such techniques is low volume, you can not buy that new car every five years from the profit on the crops you sell (In fact it has been found to be more profitable to use a horse then a tractor on such small farms). Large industrial farms tend to plant only one crop per field so that any weeding and harvesting can be done by machine. For examples acres and acres of Corn. Bush Beans (Bush Beans can be harvested by machine, Pole Beans have to be hand harvested) instead of Pole Beans, Fields with nothing but pumpkins. More productive per crop but less productive per acre if you count more then one crop per acre.

Admiral Rickover in one of his speeches pointed this out in the 1950s (While pointing out that oil would peak production around 2000, a prediction made by many people and should have happened except the oil crisis of the 1970s delayed the problem by 5-10 years do to the drop in the increase in demand for oil in the 1970s). Rickover mentions it in passing, i.e. many third world countries can NOT modernized for any such attempt will first lead to a drop in Food Production (i.e. small farms turned into big farms that can be farmed by machine as opposed to by hand).

Rickover's Speech in 1957:
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/23151
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC