Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloom vs. Solar: Which One is Best?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bik0 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:19 AM
Original message
Bloom vs. Solar: Which One is Best?
Corporate buyers and households will be asked to pick between fuel cells and solar. Here’s how they stack up.

Bloom Energy today formally unveiled its energy server, an industrial solid oxide fuel cell that can convert natural gas or other hydrocarbons into electricity pretty much on demand.

And in the process, the company has ignited a debate over which of the alternatives to coal, nuclear and centralized natural gas plants might be best. Can we answer it today? No -- one of the pivotal factors will be how Bloom's servers (formerly known as Bloom Boxes) perform over time. Board member Colin Powell said at the unveiling that the company doesn't have twenty years of user data.

But we can speculate and compare. And here are some of the key things to keep an eye on.

http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/bloom-vs.-solar-which-one-is-best/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like to know when or if they'll be cheap enough
to buy and available to actual consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm waiting for a cold fusion generator to be available at Target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bik0 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bloom puts out energy 24/7
Edited on Thu Feb-25-10 11:56 AM by bik0
That's a huge advantage over wind and solar. And Bloom can operate ANYWHERE. Solar is not practical in northern climates, there are very few areas where wind makes sense - coastal, deserts and plains.

Solar or wind will not provide enough power to power a house or building 100% unless you have a lot of land - another advantage for Bloom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. 'anywhere' that you have a gas supply
If you have a significant supply of biogas (eg you're a farm or landfill site) then it's carbon neutral. If not, it still runs on fossil fuels. They're claming it's more efficient than a gas turbine, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Don't forget you have to connect wind and solar to the grid...
...with all the inherent transmission losses. With Bloom, the power is produced at the end user. If there is already natural gas in a location there wouldn't be much more to do to hook up a system. The issue comes when everybody has a Bloom Box in their house. Where is the excess gas going to come from to feed into them? There's only so much biogas that can be produced without a major ramping up of that infrastructure, and the past couple of years of surplus natural gas doesn't mean it will always be that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Bloom Energy recommends connecting their system to the grid
Edited on Thu Feb-25-10 01:03 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://www.bloomenergy.com/benefits/energy-security/
...
  • The systems can operate in grid parallel mode — the grid provides a great backup and surge handler.
...


http://www.bloomenergy.com/benefits/more-benefits-and-applications/
...

Reverse Backup: Businesses often purchase generators and other expensive backup applications that sit idle 99% of the time, while they purchase their electricity from the grid as their primary source. The Bloom solution allows customers to flip that paradigm, by using the Energy Server as their primary power, and only purchasing electricity from the grid to supplement the output when necessary. Increased asset utilization leads to dramatically improved ROI for Bloom Energy's customers.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Bloom may not be appropriate for use in "northern climates"
http://c0688662.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/downloads_pdf_Bloomenergy_DataSheet_ES-5000.pdf
...

Standard temperature range | 0° to 40° C (extreme weather kit available)

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Both & Neither
They both have advantages and disadvantages in different applications.

Most importantly, solar is the ultimate renewable energy source.

Today, devices like the Bloom Box can be deployed quickly, to provide relatively clean energy, relatively cheaply.
Conceivably in the future, both may be used in concert, reversing the Bloom Box to store solar energy in the form of fuel for use when the sun is not shining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's something that is different from the other threads
In this article, it says "A 100-kilowatt Bloom server array costs around $700,000 to $800,000, or $7,500 a kilowatt, after incentives that cover around 50 percent of the costs."

In the other threads on this subject, thread authors are taking the incentive value off of the $700k to $800k and peg the price per unit at around $350k. Which is right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bik0 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The $350K was derived by using the $700K and applying a 20% state credit and 30% federal credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's not what this article says
It says the cost will be $700k after incentives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'd say someone has made a mistake
It could be the several articles which said one thing, or this article which said something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bik0 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The article is wrong. It's $700K BEFORE incentives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Which is better, the car's engine or the gasoline?
You haven't got a clue...

The fuel cell has to have an input of STORED ENERGY.

Therefore the actual question you are asking for the Bloom fuel cell is: Which is better natural gas and a fuel cell or solar and a battery?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The question is the headline of the article cited in the OP
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/bloom-vs.-solar-which-one-is-best

Bloom vs. Solar: Which One is Best?

Corporate buyers and households will be asked to pick between fuel cells and solar. Here’s how they stack up.

...


Which is better to do first? Shoot off your mouth or ask questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. No questions are needed.
The poster and I had a discussion on the topic yesterday - that's why biko made the op.

Which is better to do first? Shoot off your mouth or ask questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Perhaps you should twice before criticizing others
"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

- Mark Twain

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Perhaps *you* should twice before criticizing others
"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." - Mark Twain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC